Laserfiche WebLink
MTNUTES OF THE ' <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 26, 2006 . <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.in, <br /> (4. #OS-3102 STONET��OOD DESXGNBUI'LD, 920BR0J-TfIVROAD SOUTH, Cunti��.cr.erl) <br /> White noted the encroachment is being doubled and fihat ihe Plamiing Conunission should review 1:his <br /> itenl agaiii. • � <br /> Sailsevei•e concttn•ed with seilding the application back to the Planning Cominission given the chauges. <br /> Petersoii stated in her view i:here have been significaizt chailges to the plans, <br /> Alexander stated parC of the reason for the confusion is the way the resolution reads and that the <br /> resolution does not cite specific llouse plaus. Alexander stated she interpreted it to mean that as long as <br /> they confonned with the setback variance,tl�ey were fine. <br /> Gustafson stated�Iie resolution reads any amendments that are iiot in coni'orniance with city code. � <br /> Peterson stated in her view they are intensifying the a�proval. <br /> Sausevere suggested any future questions be directed to Mr. Gaffron. <br /> Gaffion stated this applicatioii would be on the July Plauning Commission agenda. <br /> Brokl noted the variance tllat was granted has already expired so it would need to go back to the Planning <br /> Coirunission. <br /> Gustafson stated they were told if tlley applied for a building�ernut it would be okay. <br /> Brokl stated the building�ermit would have beeii issued based on the site plan that was approved. <br /> Gaffron inquued whetlier a renewal variaiice application should be brought, ' <br /> Brokl stated a new application should be subniitted. <br /> The City Council referred this a�plication to the Plaiming Conmiission. <br /> 5. #OS-3131 STEVE BOHL OF BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT,INC.,190 WII.LOW DRXVE <br /> NORTH AND 177 GLENDALE D1tiV�—RPUD/FIN'AL PLAT/REZONING—RESOLUTION <br /> NO. 5480 AND O�Il�TANCE NO.34,TffiRD SE�27ES <br /> Mark Gronberg,Suiveyor, aiid Chris Pearson,Attorney-at-Law,were preseilt. <br /> � Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting final�lat approval for Gleiidale Cove, Gaffi on stated tlie <br /> •> applicant is requesting a�proval of an ordii�auce for rezoning tlie properly,except for the clnirch lot,froin <br /> RIZ-1B Rural Resideiitial Disirict to RPUD Residential�laiuled Unit Developiiient District; ilie PUD No. <br /> 5 A�eenleilt,which esfiablislles the oilgoing coiiditions of PUD a�provll as well as providing for the � <br /> iilstallation of improvements; ax�d a resolutioii granting geiieral developnient plaii ap�roval and fii�al plat <br /> approval. The approvals are conditioxZed on the developer following tlie"$cological Restoratioii& <br /> Maitagenlent Progranz for Glendale Cove"Uy A�S,I�ic. Althouglz tlie covenants have iloi:been received <br /> froni the a�plicanl:as of yet, Siaff will confinn upon receipt tliat tliey contain language requii�iiig on�oing <br /> il�anagexilent oFtlie conuzzoix spaces iii confonnance with ilie ALS pro�•ain. Siaff is expecti�ig that the <br /> , <br /> � PAGE 5 of 9 <br />