|
1 � '
<br /> Kemp�Ccommented that the issue appears to be I�ardcovec and thlt 11ong lot like this does create some
<br /> hlydship and would rec�uire some addition�[ h�►rdcover.
<br /> Rahn stated in his view the width of the driveway could be reduced slightly,which would allow for
<br /> some turn-lround.
<br /> 3 yd .
<br /> Jurgens inquired whlfi porlion of Ehe driveway the contractor v�%�3aftenlpting to m�ke less steep.
<br /> �;1 u; e�S'��rr f3:
<br /> �t�i ~'�In�T�yi�°._,� �
<br /> Vogstrom stated appro�im�tely 30 feet firom the ioad tliey are goic�a�fo tty{�fa Elaiten it out somewhat.
<br /> � ��G Y.�'S# 1`�Fl T.,�N �a v.'{ k�i .
<br /> ta �tdi ^t. b�t3F� t yt��.i'a3{ �gt` ��
<br /> Jurgens noted that work is not reflected on the grading plan Jurge�is`�ndiclfed he would ltke tl�at worlc
<br /> } i t L �s .ay�:,t. R,�.>7 1' 3'`SY}� ��tF"+t
<br /> S
<br /> 5�Y ;�r' ��T�' � �c�„ar�it,:
<br /> to be reflected on the plan. �;' ,�- <,k:;t�;�,: t; 7;:ki ;.
<br /> fr��iy iC`.a S F �ec,, ' _5 s,:5�3
<br /> R�sy ��."� Fr t t. cs:, .
<br /> .Lt'��'� "' � zS r �
<br /> Vogstrom stated he could reflect that, `'�`�`���.. '`<<'� ' r 4'��i�
<br /> ° � �
<br /> �.� w s .� ,�- ���,
<br /> <, ��,��;tix�,
<br /> Jurgens stated in his view the turn-around �s necessaiy}but that the di ivewly could be lessened
<br /> ��� } :f; 5 r
<br /> � A.�y ` s?�i ry` r a�t , h` ..r,a*. .
<br /> socnewhat. fr�i t ' T`�t-� �k4�j `�`��
<br /> '.� �a_ �'t Sz:.G
<br /> n'�+ ,�y�!,! eru�y� �v sJa�r.,
<br /> � x
<br /> fix i .� r`�l`��'"�'V�'�hJ - "4 r.�r , ;. .
<br /> Bremer commented she is not sure that a iiirn`around is..tiecessaiys�but tiiat if the turn-around stays
<br /> R_ �
<br /> ,� �'kF��..,i' Yf' ;vF k Yb,� ����'� �•Y::
<br /> within the same amount of hardcov.er�cur�ently refle,cted in the�:plans, she would be supportive of it.
<br /> , � �� t _;
<br /> 1�k*",��,,,} ��,`��`, _�.��,'. ;,
<br /> ���? 7 1'" 1..�'F ti7i-trg(.� y�s'?�?.
<br /> Bremer stated in her view 32 perce�t.hardcover is e�cess��e flnd that the hardcover could be reduced to
<br /> ' �{t>� a5��'�+_�3
<br /> ,�"Y�� t,s r�'{ ��;� f�?�, '
<br /> 30 percent �-�♦�l� ,x�Y'��"�`'
<br /> ,r i.
<br /> _ a�y>,{s�k'f,y�4�iF - .
<br /> �Y y 'C" �`rZ4t� �7�
<br /> Vogstrom stated�he�would Ue forcedto br�ngt[le house even closer to the road if he is required to reduce
<br /> f.� �.s ��r}4t FTtf.va4. it'�4Yi:� M1' �43'liT7k���t si
<br /> the hardcover anyfii�rthei �,V'ogst�om stafe`d 1ie is�aitempting to comply with the City's restrictions.
<br /> ,�,�.ti��: � � t,
<br /> �F f'��+��c� it Cr::�c} t -_.. ��:�`�i _
<br /> Juigen�'stated Ile does feel a;tt�rn ai�ound is necessary but thlt lle.is not in favor of additional I�ardcover.
<br /> �.
<br /> ��3'�c i� }f�F._.
<br /> � �-�<u� �4�t�r;
<br /> ;£Jurgens yecommended the applicaiit;reduce the hlydcover on the lot somewhat.
<br /> i y,.
<br /> , Cy ��v�s�{•Itt} � f ��..�«�}i
<br /> �,z.J_�`5 r�` ��,� ,.'"3 y'�r
<br /> Rahn rioted tlie liouse is only at l0:percent structural coverage.
<br /> . `y� 4r ,7.4 ° : �£ r...,
<br /> {�j ,'i} t� � � z�`�r ..
<br /> �f�s F;
<br /> Kemp�'stated th�s house, cotnpared to the house on Dunwoody, is in line wifh the two houses on each
<br /> '� �.�r-}+ �, „
<br /> � E �:.� ,,,° .'i4•�
<br /> a .�;t 4 p 3 ,i_:� .
<br /> side of it 1nd sfill has'a.smaller drivewly. Kempf concurred thafi the house is not out of character with
<br /> the other houses in the nei�hborhood. �
<br /> Ralm suggestect the applicant consicier removing si�feet of driveway up ne�►c fihe garage.
<br /> Curtis noted the neighboring homes do have detiched garlges.
<br />
|