Laserfiche WebLink
� , <br /> FILE#06-3184 <br /> 10 May 11,2006 <br /> . Page 4 of 4 <br /> sta�idards, as it will be difficult to aclueve 25% on tliis 60' lakeshore lot without reducing <br /> the house/garage footprint dowil to 1,200 s.f.—assuniing the miniinu.tn required driveway <br /> aud sidewalk widtlis aiid a nlodest deck. Staff would reason filiat the overall footprint of <br /> tlie home is below tlie 15% s�iuctural lunit aud results in a more r�easonttble level of 75' — <br /> 250' hardcover. <br /> Issues for Considerltion <br /> 1. Otlier than the City Engineer's issues are there auy other issues or coizcercls witli this <br /> application? <br /> 2. The applicaut wanted to include a small t�una.round near the house, but omitted it <br /> fiom his plaiis in t�ie liope of lesseiung hardcover. Wliat is the Plamiing <br /> Coiuulission's feeling on includiug a sivall turnaround on site? Topography may <br /> make backuig out difficult. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width aud lot area variauces, aizd some <br /> level of hardcover variance witlun the 75' — 250' zone as the Planning Commission <br /> deternunes appropriate. The applicants should asstue that the proposed home meet the <br /> City's height liiiiit of 30' a.nd 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that <br /> the property owners comply with the City Eiigineer's recommendations. <br /> 4 <br />