My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2G9S �Casco Point Road Variance Request �� � '� <br /> Sent Via Fax ta 952-Z49-4616 <br /> March 20,2006 <br /> Ci.fy oi Orono <br /> 2750 Ke]Iey Parkwa� <br /> p0 Box 66 . , <br /> Crysta.l Bay, MN 55323 <br /> RE:V'ariance Requests for 2695 Casco�Point Road <br /> Y3y Par�l Thomas Homes <br /> It appears that the req�est is no longer on tonight's planning comznission agenda. <br /> WE assuzne it will get rescheduled for another meeting. We would like to submit some <br /> comments in regard to the pro�osed req�iest via this letter. We ar�doing this just in case <br /> we bave to miss the ne�ct meeting. We are also doin�it in the hopa that the city's <br /> eiigineers can addxess the drainage issues &automobile turnaround issuss that this <br /> properi;y suffers from. <br /> IVIy v�tife a.nd I live next doar io the subject property. �Ne h�ve iivcd at 2641 <br /> Casco Point Road since June of 1991. We have seen a lot of changes�ta our <br /> neighborhoad in that period of time and we lilco the xebuilding that has been occurring. <br />� The n�w owner of this property,Paul Thomas Yiames,has requested variances to .. <br /> allow t1�em to tcar down 1he current house and build a new one. The new owner is a <br /> builder who has previously built on lakeshore in our fair city. So the new�wner was <br /> fully aware of the city's �rdinances when he purehased the property. <br /> There is really only one variancE that the caty caa rea11�take issue with iu the <br /> nn�ice that was sen�to me,that being the h,udcaver requast for the 75' to 2S0' zone. <br /> There is a current house on the property Ehat the new owtaer wants to tesr dowa and <br /> r.eplace: The current house is already we11 in excess nf the 25%hardcover limitatiun for � <br /> this zone. This hardcover was already approved by thc city when the house was <br /> originally built in 19�9. In fact there is less hatdcover today then originally approved by <br /> the city. A previo'us owner removed a back deck sys�tem last summer,reducing a couple <br /> huf�dred feet af hardcover in�lus zonc. <br /> All that said,we want the buildel to be able to build as large a house as he vvants <br /> too, assuming: . <br /> 1, that no set baek or height vaziances are required, <br /> 2. that no part of the prop�rty is built wifhin the zero ta 75' zone, and <br /> 3. that total haz'dcaver is no greater than vvhat the property currently uses within <br /> the 75' to 250' zone, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.