My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNTNG COMMISSION MEETING ����� <br /> Monday,June 19,2006 � � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. � <br /> Alexander commented from her standpoint this is a tough remodel since the property is over on <br /> structural coverage and hardcover. Alexander indicated Staff did encourage squaring off the garage, <br /> which is why they chose to pursue the side yard setback. <br /> Rahn stated he cannot think of an instance where he voted in favor of a setback variance, and that if the <br /> applicant would like to retain the deck,other hardcover would have to be removed. Rahn commented it <br /> comes down to the choices the applicant chooses to make and that there is an excessive amount of <br /> hardcover on this lot. Rahn stated in his view this appears to be a major project and goes beyond just <br /> adding a second story. <br /> Alexander stated a few interior walls will be relocated and that they will be tearing off the roof and <br /> adding a second story. <br /> Rahn inquired whether all the exterior walls would remain. <br /> Alexander indicated they would remain. <br /> Rahn inquired whether an engineer has b�en consulted regarding the extra weight that�vill be placed on <br /> the foundatiou. <br /> Alexander stated an engineer has reviewed that. <br /> Rahn stated he is in favor of staff's proposal. <br /> Jurgens stated he agrees the side yard setback is a design issue and he would not be in favor of it. <br /> Jurgens stated in his opinion the deck is massive and could be reduced further. <br /> Anderson pointed out they have removed some of the hardcover on the lot. <br /> Jurgens stated in his view the hardcover could be reduced,further and that the applicant has the option of <br /> renting a storage unit. Jurgens commented even though the hardcover was in existence prior to the <br /> applicants purchasing the property,no hardcover variances have been granted for this property. Jurgens <br /> stated a hardship has to be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted and that the only hardship <br /> he sees is that the house was constructed and then the codes changed. <br /> PAGE 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.