My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> Y <br /> FILE#06-3208 <br /> June 19,2008� } <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> with ihe adjaceiit Western Steel property. The turnback plan would not provide a median <br /> opening for this access so it would be would be right-in/right-out only. The City Engineer <br /> recon�uneiids the current driveway be restricted to right-in/right-out until the inedian is <br /> constructed. He also recorruizends the driveway access to Old Crysfal Bay Road be right- <br /> in/right-out ouly. The intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road atid the new street would be fiill <br /> movemeiit. The Conunission should address the locatioii and fiinetion of the accesses to <br /> Wayzata Boulevard and Old Crysfial Bay Road in its comments. <br /> Utilities: Lots are proposed to be seived by City water aud sewer. Drainage would be to the <br /> new Highway 12 system. Property is within the MUSA. Sewer and water are available in <br /> Wayzata Boulevard to be extended to serve developrnent. Confirmation is reqLiired that new <br /> Higliway 12 systein has the capacity for the development. <br /> Existin�Buildin�s and Develonment Phlsin�: There are two buildings on the property. <br /> The snlall office buildiiig (origiilally a house)near the corner would be reinoved at the start <br /> of development. The larger building has two parts connected by an enclosed walkway. The <br /> Ia.rger(masoiuy)portion of the building would remain and be renovated. It would occupy <br /> L3B2 and comply with setbacks. The smaller(metal)portion of the building would occupy <br /> L1B2. It would be removed before L1B1 was developed or when L1B2 was redeveloped. <br /> The developer should be asked to detail the proposed developmenfi phasiiig plan. The <br /> Cominission should address the appropriateness of the proposed phasing plan and its <br /> implications for circulation in its conunents. <br /> Other Issues for Consideration <br /> Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW ANALYSIS <br /> Tlze attached analysis worksheet provides a review of how tlus proposal coniplies with the <br /> provision of the Industrial Dist�ict Ordinance. <br /> Other Issues for Consideration <br /> Are there aily otlier issues or concerns wi�li this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recoininends that the Plaiuiing Commission review and conuiient on the <br /> followiiig: <br /> 1. Proposed Office Warehouse Use <br /> 2. Site Layout � <br /> 3. Building Design aiid Materials <br /> 4. Developinent Phasiiig <br /> 5. Coiiforiiiity with the Iiidustrial District Standards <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.