My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
06-19-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 10:54:28 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 10:54:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
366
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
��• � . <br /> WINSTON LAW OFFICE <br /> April 24, 2006 <br /> ��������? <br /> ���� � � 2oos <br /> P(ann ng Di ecfforn C'TY ��` oRQ�� <br /> City of Orono � � <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> PO Box 66 � <br /> Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ° <br /> RE: Variance /��plication; Orono Case No. 06-3204 <br /> Dear Mr. Gaffron: <br /> Thank you for your response to my earlier email message in which I was <br /> advocating an opportunity to be heard by the Planning Commission in May. With that <br /> opportunity no longer available, let me try to get the train back on the tracks for June. <br /> Before doing so, let me state some fundamental observations, which may assist <br /> in the process. You and Melanie work for the City, and want what is best for the City. <br /> The Lindbloom family.lives in the City, and has.been in residence at the Rainey Road <br /> address for five years. The Lindblooms, too;.want,what is best for the.City, and for their <br /> neighborhood. My family and I also live in the Ci#y--for almost ten years now. We want <br /> what is best for the City. We are all on the same side here. With that said, I would like <br /> the opportunity to come to a reasonable resolution of the Lindblooms' variance request, <br /> and so I turn to the substantive points of your message. _ .��`" J.. <br /> I used the term "simple" in my email message to you, because the issue is fairly <br /> straight forward. There is a side yard setback requirement in Orono. The map <br /> submitted to the City shows one proposed structure 31 feet from the side lot line, and �:�'��`--?�, <br /> . p / 'p��r <br /> another proposed struct«re 10 feet from the I�ne. Do th.,se structures encroach otier the �f:�� <br /> applicable setback line or don't they? I did not mean to belittle the application process. <br /> �.n��,... <br /> It's just that the Lindblooms were not and are not applying for a 20 lot subdivision or a �=_'"''��`°'4:� <br /> rezoning or some other more controversial approval. Quite simply, when I made my `,,.:...........S;;w� <br /> appeal to you for a spot on the May Planning Commission Agenda, I was trying to have �`�'''' �� <br /> - the matter heard sooner rather than later, for obvious reasons, and to that end I was ,-�.;•� �;� <br /> advocatin the sim licit of the re uest. ���'�'�• � <br /> 9 p Y q ,��;��;.:•'� F.,f <br /> h= ,>:. <br /> ; t;; <br /> . {�'f',1 •�t�}�. <br /> �[.:: <br /> Then, as to the quality of the Lindbloom's map; Chad Lindbloom will have a ,;5:.. ;:��,.� <br /> surve or Mark Gronber or the ori inal surve or re are a better de iction of the . `�`���� �"����' <br /> Y � g J Y ) p p P� i <br /> ro ert , but it will show the same 31' and 10' distances:.. �.�•�_� <br /> p p Y . .. . :;; ,x:�� <br /> . . � . �� �a.� <br /> �� �-�� <br /> ���� <br /> g912 IDS Center,8o South�ightli Street,Minneapolis,Mimiesota 55402 <br /> Telephone: 6i2.34i.9800 I'acsimile: Gi2.33a.ia15 Einail:wuilaw@popp.net <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.