My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
05-15-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 10:38:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 10:38:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 2G9.5 �Casco Paint Road Variance Request <br /> Sent VYa Fax ta 952-�49-4616 <br /> March 20, 2006 <br /> Ci.ty o�Orono <br /> 2750 Kelle�Parkway <br /> PO�ax 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br /> RE:V'ariance Requestis for 2695 Casco�Point Road <br /> T3y Pa�l Thomas Homes <br /> It appeazs that the request is no longer on tonight's planning commission agenda, <br /> WE assume it will�et rescheduled for suother meeting. We would like to submit some <br /> comments in regazd to the pro�os�d req�i�st via this leiter. We ar�doing this just in case <br /> we hav� to miss the n��c�t meeting. We are alsa doing it iz�the hope that the city's <br /> ei�gineers can address the drainage issues &automobile Curnaround issues that this <br /> properi:y suffers frorn. <br /> My tirtife and I live next door to the subject property. We h�ve livcd at 2691 <br /> Casco Paint Road since June of 1991. We have seen a 1ot of changes�ca our <br /> neigllborhoad in that period of time and we lika t1�.e xebuilding thaf has been occurring. <br /> . "rhe n�w owner o�this property,�'aul Thomas J-�ames,has requested variances to <br /> allow them ta tcar dovv��the current house and build a new one. The new owner is a <br /> builder who has pteviously built on lak�shore in our:Eair city. So the new owner was <br /> £�11�aware of the city's ordinances when he purchased the property. <br /> There is really only one vaxiance t�hat the city can reaU.�take issue with u1 lhe <br /> no�ice that was sen�ta me,that being the h�rdcvver requ�st��or the '15' to 250' zone. <br /> There is a current house on the property that ihe new owi�er wants to iear down aa�.d <br /> r.eplace. The current house is already well in excess of the 25%liardcov�r limitatiun for <br /> this zo�ne_ This hazdcover was already approved by thc city when the house was <br /> originally built in 19x9. In fact there is les�hardcover today khen originally approved by <br /> thc city. A previn�us owner removed a back dock sys�tem last summer,reducin�a couple <br /> hut�dred feeti af hardeover in tlus zonc. <br /> All that said,we want the buildex to be able to build as large a house as he wants <br /> too, assumin�: . <br /> 1, that no set back or h�3ght vaziances are r�quired, <br /> 2. that no part of the prop�rty is buiit wifhin the zero to 7S' zone, �nd <br /> 3. that total hazdcover is no greater than what the property currently uses within <br /> the 75' to 250' zone, <br /> . ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.