Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3184 <br /> 10 May 11,2006 , <br /> . Page 4 of 4 <br /> stanc�ards, as it will be difficult to achieve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot without reducing <br /> the house/garage footprint dov�ni to 1,200 s.f.—assuming the miiuinum required driveway <br /> and sidewalk widths and a modest deck. Staff wottld reason that the overall footprint of <br /> the home is below the 15% struchiral limit and results in a inore�°ecrsonable level of 75' — <br /> 250' hardcover. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Other tlzan the City Engineer's issues are there any other issues or concerns with this <br /> application? <br /> 2. The applicant wanted to inchide a small turnaround near the house, but omitted it <br /> from his plans in the hope of lessening hardcover. What is the Planning <br /> Coinmission's feeling oii inchiding a small turnaround on site? Topography may <br /> make backing out difficult. , <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recorrunends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some <br /> level of hardcover vaxiance witlun the 75' — 250' zone as the Planning Cominission <br /> deternunes appropriate. The applicants should assure that the proposed home meet the <br /> City's height lunit of 30' and 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that <br /> the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations. <br /> 4 <br />