My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
05-15-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 10:38:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 10:38:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#06-3200 1374 Rest Point Circle <br /> May 11,2006 , <br /> Page 4 <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> (Pro�osed house/porclies/gazebo) 3,019 s.f. /28,500 s.f. = 10.6% (15.0% allowed) <br /> Yards/Setbacks: <br /> LR-1B Required Existing Proposed <br /> Street Yard 35' 14' � 36' <br /> Right Side Yard(West) 10' S4' 19' <br /> Left Side Yard(East) 10' Garage 10' 19' <br /> � ' House 42' <br /> Lakeshore (929.4' contour) 75' House 135' House 110' <br /> Pool patio 63' Pool Patio 63' <br /> Average Lakeshore No Encroacluileiit 1'00l and Gazebo 'Pool and gazebo <br /> encroach encroach <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Hardcover Total Area Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone in Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> _ _ � . .. 0-75' 10,100 s.f. 0 sf (0%) . 822 sf (8.14%) 822 sf (8.14%) • • �, <br /> 75-250' 18,400 s.f. 4,600 sf {25%) Not Pravided 6,056 sf(32.91%) <br /> Totals 28,500 s.f. 4,600 sf -______ 6,878 sf <br /> (equivalent of 37.4% of <br /> 75-250' zone)* <br /> � *includes 151 sf of stairs <br /> and retaining walls near <br /> � lake � <br /> City Engineer's Comments ' <br /> The City Eiigineer 11as briefly reviewed the gradiiig and drainage pla.n and has not provided <br /> written coiiuiients pending the revisioiis that will likely result fronl changes to address building <br /> heiglrt issues. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Should the pool be allowed to remain in conjunction with tlie rebuild? <br /> 2. Is there aiiy justification for a liardcover variance in either zone? <br /> 3. Is there atly justification to consider a variance to height liinitations? (applicant has not <br /> requested a height variance...) _ <br /> . , . „ � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.