Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> t� <br /> a <br /> I #06-3185 WJM Properties LLC , 1 � 7. <br /> � April 14,2006 , � � <br /> � Pnge 4 -" <br /> ; <br /> � � �ti <br /> � <br /> i <br /> . While the City has no inteiit to limit free speech, any advertising oii flags on either poie <br /> would be considered as signage,which is limited to approximately 1540 s.f. under the old <br /> � ordinance and to appro�:iinately 330 s.f. under the new I District ordiiia.iice... � <br /> � • <br /> � 5. The fifth request by the applicant is to amend tlie eaisting CUP conditions wifihin Resolut on <br /> � No. 4845. Please carefiilly review Page 3 of the applicaiit's narrative letter of request <br /> � (Exlubit B). The existiiig language identifies different types of velucles fihat will be stored?in <br /> the main easterly parking lot as "new vehicles and finished velucles ready for delivery to <br /> dealerslups". It goes on to state that up to 40 vehicles may be parked for"display" at t e <br /> north end of the iilain parking lot(15 cars)and at the north eiid of the building(25 cars). T�ie <br /> "display"velucle la.nguage was originally ultended to make a distinction between those cars <br /> that are for demonst�ation purposes as part of the fleet sales and leasing element of��he <br /> Monies operation at this site. Specifically,per Finding G of Resohition No. 4845,"...It is <br /> the understaizding of the Planning Coirunission that the outside display area is for the fleet <br /> � <br /> customer test drive and viewing,but not to attract the general public to the site for individ�a1 <br /> purchase of vehicles." � <br /> . �. <br /> � In acivality,it is probably impossible for the public to visually perceive a difference between <br /> caxs stored for demonstration purposes or cars stored or parked for other purposes on the si�te. <br /> s It appears that the applicant does not want to be limited to 40 demonstration vehicles, and <br /> requests that any cars in excess of 40 for denionstration pluposes be allowed on site but be <br /> � stored in the south end of the east lot. ' <br /> i <br /> ; Note that parking oil the site as laid out in the site plan(Exhibit D)has the capacity for 542 <br /> vehicles,which would include employee and customer vehicles as well as vehicles stored for <br /> , display, iiew vehicles for fleet sales, vehicles awaiting preparation or repair, etc. The 250 <br /> � velucle linutation on "parking of new velucles and finished velucles ready for deliveiy�to <br /> ' dealerships"imposed by ResolutioiiNo.4845 was not specifically expanded to 320 velucles <br /> 3 ui Resolution No. 53881ast fall, although functioiially that approval added about 100 stalls <br /> � south of the existing lot. <br /> � <br /> . , <br /> ; Platuiing Commission should consider whether there are any "dowiisides" to revising tl�ie <br /> laaiguage as suggested by the applicalit. r� <br /> ; . <br /> i Other Potential Items for Discussion ; <br /> � Lighting for the new parking area is proposed to be a coiltinuation of the approved lightiiig plan. � <br /> ; This is acceptable and is expected to have no impacts on nearby residential properties wluch are � <br /> : all more tlian 600' distant from the parking area. . ; <br /> ' ; <br /> 1 No additional signage is proposed with this building adclition and parking/storage expansion. ^ <br /> � <br /> f - <br /> ; <br /> 1 <br /> �: <br /> �� <br /> � <br /> � <br />