Laserfiche WebLink
' MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,March 13,2006 <br /> , 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (3. #OS-3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHOItELINE DRIVE, Co�ztinued) <br /> Gaffron noted the resolution would also address some of the other concerns raised previously that were <br /> -'�=---°not discussed this evening:� Gaffron requested the applicants sign an extension of the review period-•-- -- o-• . -v- - _ `� <br /> tonight. <br /> McMillan moved,Murphy seconded,to table Application#05-3121,Narrows Saloon,3382 <br /> Shoreline Drive,and to direct Staff to draft an approval resoIution. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 4. #05-3136 TROY BROITZMAN, 1860 SHORELINE DRIVE—VARIANCE AND <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> Troy Broitzman,Applicant,was present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant has submitted a revised plan and is requesting an average lakeshore setback <br /> variance and a lot width variance. Gaffron noted this property is located in a two-acre zone,with the lot <br /> consisting of 1.9 acres and being 133 feet wide. <br /> The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their February 20�'meeting and voted 6-0 to <br /> recommend approval of the revised plan, granting lot width and average setback variances,with the <br /> condition that the grading be minimized as much as possible to preserve any trees that are existing on the <br /> site and conditioned on submittal of a landscape plan depicting the mitigation of the sight line views for <br /> the neighbors prior to Council review of the application. <br /> Gaffron illustrated on the overhead the location of the proposed residence and the two adjoining <br /> residences. The applicant has located the house so that its greatest encroachment past the average setback <br /> line is 100 feet, defined by the two adjacent lakeshore homes. Based on discussions at the September and <br /> October Council meetings,the applicant has located the house to meet an average setback line defined by <br /> the immediately adjacent home to the east and the second adjacent home to the west. The property <br /> owners at 1910 Heritage have requested that the house be located slightly rearward to line up with their <br /> extended front line and avoid impacting their lake views to the right. <br /> In addition,the applicant has submitted a screening plan that would place evergreens along the southwest <br /> lot line,with the potential to eventually provide heavy screening of the new home from that side. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant has revised his plan significantly since the last time it was before the Council. <br /> The proposal now calls for cuts of 1,983 cubic yards and fills of 1,626 cubic yards,resulting in a balance <br /> that requires exportation of only 356 cubic yards from the site. Staff has concluded that the proposed <br /> grading plan does not have the negative impacts on the neighborhood that earlier plans created,and the <br /> current plan could be construed as not rising to the thresholds that would require a land alteration <br /> conditional use permit. Gaffron noted the City Engineer has reviewed the various proposals and�nds this <br />-- one acceptable. --�- -- - - -� ---�� -� <br /> Gaffron stated this application was submitted prior to the new wetland ordinance and that the applicant <br /> meets the 26-foot setback that was required at the time the application was submitted. <br /> Gaffron indicated the applicant is proposing to remove the existing driveway to Shoreline Drive and <br /> create a new driveway to Heritage Drive at the rear, similar to the layout of his two adjacent lakeshore <br /> neighbors. The proposed driveway meets the City's 26' wetland setback that was in effect at the time this <br /> PAGE 9 of 27. <br />