My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
04-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 10:22:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` NIINUTES OF TFIE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,March 13,2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (3. #OS-3121 NARROWS SALOON, 3382 SHORELINE DRIVE, Contincced) <br /> eye banks internationally and locally. Thorp stated the goal of the Northwest Tonka Lions is to put the <br /> . . <br /> ..... ,... ... ..:money ac mto�t e-commumty ....... .,�.. _..� ,—..�, ..__--_.__._._ . ..__. .,.. � . ...�.. . .,... ..,�, <br /> Sansevere inquired whether the comments regarding the parking are accurate and if Staff feels the parking <br /> is adequate for what is being proposed. <br /> Gaffron stated he does not feel that he knows the parking situation adequately in this area and that the <br /> available parking is less than what is required by code. Gaffron stated the city-owned parking lot is <br /> publicly owned and not apportioned to individual businesses and is designed to serve a variety of <br /> businesses and uses. Gaffron stated it is difficult for Staff to determine whether the parking in this area <br /> will be adequate in the future and that he is not in a position to say whether the parking will work in this <br /> situation. <br /> McMillan stated if the City is not going to dedicate certain parking spaces,it is difficult to determine the <br /> future parking needs of the area and that the parking is more on a first-come, first-serve basis. <br /> Sansevere inquired whether alcohol would be allowed out on the patio area. <br /> Sudheimer stated there would be no alcohol allowed on the smoking area. � <br /> Sansevere inquired whether there would be a curfew on the hours for the smoking area. <br /> Anderst stated they do not want to put a curfew on the hours that smokers could access the patio. <br /> Sansevere stated in his opinion it is unfair to the neighbors to not restrict the hours that people will be out <br /> on the smolcing area. Sansevere inquired whether the number of nights of live entertainment would be <br /> reduced. - <br /> Sudheimer indicated they have reduced their entertainment to three nights with only a soloist. <br /> Sanford stated the idea of the patio area is to restrict the smokers to a certain area. <br /> , <br /> Sansevere stated in his opinion there would be noise issues from the patio. <br /> Sanford stated the smoking situation is already occurring and that this provides a centralized place for the <br /> smokers to go. <br /> Anderst stated the point of the smoking area is to allow smokers a place to go outside and smoke due to <br /> the change in the laws and to confine them to one area. <br /> Sansevere stated in his mind the parking issue is his biggest concern along with the noise that could be <br /> generated from the smoking area. <br /> Sanford stated with regard to the open patio space,there would be seating for approximately 32 people. <br /> Anderst pointed out there are supposed to be tables depicted on the plan and not just an open area. <br /> PAGE 5 of 27 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.