My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
04-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 10:22:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
't. . <br /> t • FILE#06-3189 ; <br /> • 11 April 2006 � <br /> . ; <br /> ;r� Page 3 of 4 � <br /> ' Hardcover Calculations: � <br /> : Hardcove�•Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Propose�l � <br /> Zone Hardcover H�rdcover Hardcover <br /> � 0 s.f 248 s.f.* 248 s.f. <br /> { 0—75 3,800 s.f. (0%) (6.5%) (6.5%) � <br /> �i , � <br /> 75—250 6,225 s.f. 1,556 s.f. 3,965 s.f.* 3,420 s.f. � <br /> � (25%) (63.7%) (54.9%) <br /> .{ * After exclusion of fabric or plastio-lined landscape beds . <br /> # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> ? Hardcover Variance <br /> , <br /> ", The applicants have requested 0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover variances. While certain <br /> � features within the 75' setback are considered "permitted" hardcover such as a lake <br /> � access stair and potentially a retaining wall, but a shed and a deck are not. The <br /> � applicants have proposed that their existing deck and a shed that sits on top of that deck <br /> �, will stay with the rebuilding of their home. <br /> ; <br /> :� Regarding the hardcover outside the 75' setback, the applicants are proposing to build a <br /> �� home similar in size to their existing home which exceeds structural coverage levels; <br /> � therefore just with the area of the house the 25% allowed hardcoyer level has been <br /> ; exceeded. , i <br /> # ; <br /> �; Side Yard Setback Variance ; <br /> . ' The applicants are proposing a side setback of 5.2' for the north portion of their proposed ' <br /> �; garage. There is a topographical change along this northern property line and the <br /> : applicants would like to nestle the garage into the hill to avoid a 5' wide "tunnel" along , <br /> ;; their house. However, this tunnel situation could be avoided with some additional site <br /> � grading. <br /> .� � <br /> ' Structural Coverage Variance . � � <br /> ,° The home proposed is similar in size to the applicanfs existing home. However, it <br /> � <br /> '; exceeds the 15% structural coverage limit by 2.34%. A home with a 1,505 s.f. . <br /> � foundation size (including garage) could be constructed meeting the structural coverage. ; <br /> . , <br /> '' Average Lakeshore Setback Variance ' <br /> `. The applicants have proposed a home which is located partially ahead of the average <br /> � lakeshore setback. i <br /> ' Hardship St�tement E <br /> •T � <br /> F Applicant has completed the Hardsliip Documenfiafiion Form attached as �xhibit B, and <br /> ' should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> t <br /> ; Hardship Analysis <br /> ,i Li co�rsidering npplicatloirs for varimice, the P/a�r�riilg Conu�rission slrnll cousider lbe effect of t/re <br /> ; proposed varinnce i�po»the/tea/th,snfety anr!welfare af t/re comnrrurity, ea�istiirg aird nnticipated lraffic • <br /> � co�irlltions, lig/r!aied nir, tlanger of frre, rlsk!o the pub/ic safety, and lhe effect ou val�res of properlJ�i�a <br /> � t/ie srrrroantling aren. Tlre Plannl�rg Can�uission sl�aU consitler recommeirdi�rg appravnl for varin�rces i <br /> � . <br /> � 3 � <br /> � <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.