04-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

; f � . • . . O� ,. � � O � O CITY of URONO , � � � � � r�,�� ti �:, ' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . j......_ .�. . G ._. . . . . _. , . . _ �`gk'ESI30�� NO. . � � 8 8.. . _ h �; . � ' . i 3. The proposed pasl:ina area expansion is nominally 200' � 200' in area, with additional , paviug to serve the proposed garage ul an area approxirnately 75' x 90' in area, coiistituting in total a�proxiinately 46,750 s.f. of added paved liardsurface in addition to the 5,000 s.f. proposed building. � 4. Tlie Orono Plai�ning Conunission reviewed this applicatioil on Septenzber 19, 2005 and recoiruzzended approval by a vote of 7 to 0 based oii the following fuzdings: . a) The proposed parkin� addition allows for an expansion of the outdoor storage for � wlucl�a CUP was previously b auted via Resolution No. 4345 in Aujust 2002. T'his . new lot takes the place of the 200' x 200' parkiilg lot originally approved at the ; southwest corner of the main buildin;but which was never constructed. b) The pro�osed parl:izz�outdoor storage expansion i� located at the south end of the; existing parkulg lot aud is remotely located fiomn Highway 12 and from adjacent� developed properties,such that additioilal screenulg of the stoxa�e is not warranted. c) The proposed building eapa�isioiz is an allowed accessoiy use in the I (Industrial) Disti�ict per Section 78-823. The proposed building nleets the niinimum 5,000 s.f' area requirement of Section 78-825(b). Building height with the flat roof proposed �vill be approtimately 20', meetiiig the 40' I District height linlit. The building will be setback more than 250' frorn all lot lines and appro�imately 95' from the nzain buildin�, meeting all required perti�ient setbacks. The addition of this building will bring tlus 23-acre site to appro�imately 27% structural coverage, far below the 45% limit for the I District. The building addition is iiot visible from , Highway 12 a�ld should not require screening due to its relatively central locatioii within the site. ' d) The buildina rvill be constructed of aggregate-faced precast concrete panels; which due to tlle inconsistency of building facade materials and colors on the site �- . � � should-be�colored to•closely�inatch the color of-the recent�l3---re-sided�accessory . gara;e buildiizg adjaceilt to the new garage building. , e) Lighting for the parl:ing area is propose�l to be a continuatioii of the approved lighting plan. This is acceptable and is expected to have no impacts on adjoinin� ; residential properties tivhich are all more tlZan 600' disiant frorn the parl:in� area. , Pa�e2of6 � �' , ;