|
� �Cr�r��i I�
<br /> - 6. #06-3172 LEMMERMAN CONSTRUCTION FOR TIMOTHY RUSS�LL AND LYNN
<br /> ANN BRADY, 3555 FR�DERICK STREET, VARIANCE,7:50 P.M.—8:43 P.M.
<br /> Tim Bcady and Lynn Brady, Applicants, and Tom Lemmerman, Coi�tractor,were present.
<br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a hardcover variance for 38.2 percent hardcover within the 75-
<br /> ,�t�.
<br /> k�xw� .i �
<br /> 250' zone where 20 percent is normally allowed and 30.9 percent�ezUrrently;e�cists in order to consfiruct a �
<br /> , s �i n�v���: t,
<br /> ( {` ri��c �t(E�<,,{�t{{3,�,,�
<br /> }54 <�ESt i�:�\ i 12f{}f�T`�i�
<br /> new attiched garage and relocate the driveway from �ts�cur�ent loc�tl,qn;oii,th�e undeveloped right-of-way
<br /> � �l� �t'C �k�F1fIs4..��fY Y�1�I
<br /> 2�tb�/��ac c y �Ytit' 'i4 r��iJ ;�� t�. y
<br /> of Carman Avenue directly to Prederick Street. Gradmg ls also required in oidei�E�o resto�e the,:side street
<br /> '���t ,j��'J .� t,`s i�'�3 4.�^ Y t}A j G e`it�.Y Y j,s .r'
<br /> '!x �r !{�� i�4 �:. "t:c. ,�t 4 �,r'{x r,..
<br /> F��yC?y�C'F h S�C �i.�i'' '+ I(C I �M�� if; D..
<br /> ylyd to Carman. The 11te�nate plan requires grading along the eas�ern property line due to the removal of
<br /> � <� r}u}�,�,�aL, .,cs`r,.�.��`
<br /> �' '�'s',�i�j�i4�`4+�'�G3x�,t! �k
<br /> the garage and restoration of the side street yard to match th�grad.es o�Garman Street.
<br /> ` F��r�;�r�t���,.
<br /> �'x.,� ��.t:.
<br /> The applicants are also requesting a side yard se�b�Fk��ar�y�ce to mamtain�the�existing 5.5 foot setback
<br /> ��'�� F SK��t`9a�P��J�i�,�r ��+��'7�s�0��f;[�
<br /> 'K Ya�.f"i4°�5*'-, "1r,� 3 rs l{4 �� '
<br /> for their second story and constructing the nev��ga�age ta�#n�eet a'�lU foot setback.
<br /> ,�����''��" j��tf���tk��ik„�s�i���f3
<br /> � I 4�'t rktk � {rrr
<br /> Planning Department Staff recommends app�o�al of tliejha'rdcover�vai�tance for the garage addition and
<br /> ; '�isyj� ����� �Z� �e `:j" -
<br /> 5 �t�i ,
<br /> street yard gcading as proposed, �n conjunction wtth'#he removal of#f�e retaining wall within 75 feet of the
<br /> r r t +r u .
<br /> Ffi,,�r r?�> � a� � p .
<br />. i�+r�yi�t'rsn' tF"';'S�rlv R,9�?S,T� r t:..�
<br /> OHWL. If the Planning Commission�feels that there�is a;�hardsh�p with respect to the lot width and the
<br /> y� p+A =?T� �y{1R( �q� j..1rj{:
<br /> ,i`SlF�� �� ''t <
<br /> rz�ti f�R1��f.d,� f�rafl��r�:i�.¢•
<br /> existing side yard setback, Staf��would,xsupport the second story at a reduced setback. Additional(y, Staff
<br /> .z,���n���t �{���
<br /> � �` Ts� �z4'�t
<br /> would not support�an,increase in str`ljctit�aY coVerage resulting in more than 15 percent. Staff would also
<br /> ,s`'�L�`isk� ��tta�apxi'� n�:��� t} ••�",f`,k aa"'"1 p�ef3.
<br /> '�i"r�'�{r� ��xi���3��:�':�4�}��u� `� �)�i,"s`'�'t��.F:��h �
<br /> request�fha�t1�e'applicatton� add'ress all of the:�itty,eiigineer s concerns.
<br /> � ',�T�"•�.� `°<��,�� �t,,r ;f `ti,�j��;.
<br /> �n�,��7i a�Ct�(' 3�i Ta`',�GtF�'��(����, �' .
<br /> Braelystated they are agreeable�ofaddressing the P1lnning Commission's concerns.
<br /> ,r�.�; �p ,wxt.����;.
<br /> ��,*irf� i�fi t�'.y�, � s I!%
<br /> z`}r' z4�r�::����xha. ��' tit�E�J"��?
<br /> Rahn opened,.,the public hearing a�`7'S3s p.in.
<br /> .-F �t ,.�. � ' �
<br /> . tii�.�fi��tE�k��Y d��s'���F�
<br /> There were4��no public commants�regarding this applicatioi�.
<br /> _ �i���s�,�j 7�i�y4i'� �> �r��1��?�'5�� .
<br /> ���� s���,.�t�'1� �n'sd k t�'�,�'D
<br /> ,�'y�;�¢e rx � ,e �ye,�fi.
<br /> Ralln closed the pEibltc�tiearm�atr7:53 N.m.
<br /> W�ztt�� ,2r�.��t i"�,,d?�'f
<br /> �
<br /> Rahn inquired whether tliey;tay agreeable to reducing ihe structural covecage to 15 percent.
<br /> ���r
<br /> Br1dy indicated they are.
<br /> Rahn inquired whether ihere was any thought given to setting back the second story to meet the side yard
<br /> setback.
<br />
|