Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION NT�ETING <br /> - Tuesday,�anuary 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Kempf stated in his view this is a unique sihiation and that the Planning Commission has made exceptions <br /> Co the average lakeshore setback in the past. ICempf noted the roofline was lowered in consideration of <br /> the neighbors. Kempf stated if permission is oUtained from the neighbor to the nortli and if the drainage <br /> works aroLind the south with the Munsons reaching a�-eement with the neighbor or keeping the drainage <br /> on this site,he would not be opposed to the application. <br /> Munson sfiated they have reached agreement with i:he neighbors on the driveway. Munson stated his <br /> lawyer is in the process of working out the easement. <br /> Bremer stated Wagener's second issue regarding the driveway has been alleviated,but the third issue <br /> raises a concern about placement of fill�vithin five feet of the property line. <br /> Munson stated there could be a proUlem with tlie drainage if he is not allowed to ft114vithin five feet of the � <br /> property line. Munson stated he would need to come down approximately six feet fonn the south side of <br /> the building and at a 45-degree angle. . <br /> Keinpf questioned whether the drainage could be resolved by�lling within five feet of the property line. <br /> Jurgens stated in his view the major issue on this application is the potential impact on the Wagener <br /> property with the fill and that he would like to see an agreement that both parties are okay�vith the fill. � � <br /> Jurgens stated some of it is a design issue and t11at it does not constitute a hardshi� to place the residence <br /> in the proposed location. Jurgens stated he would lilce to see those issues addressed prior to moving � <br /> forward with the application. <br /> Kempf inquired how far onto Wagener's property the retaining wall is located. <br /> Gaffron stated fihe majority of the refiaining wall is on Wagener's property. <br /> Jurgens pointed out the retaining�vall has a back fall to it. . <br /> Gaffi•on ill�istrated the retaining wall and the]ot line on the overhead. Gaffron indicated Wa�ener is the <br /> high side and Munson is the low side. Gaffron stated the City's code does not allow fill �vithin five feet <br /> of a property line. <br /> PAGE 21 <br />