Laserfiche WebLink
- �"�'� , <br /> ��-�-�-- <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING �,��^���.,.� �,� <br /> MONDAY,NOVEN�ER 24,2003 <br /> \ <br /> , ��,� <br /> LMCD REPO�TtT—'LILI MCNIILLAN,REPRESENTATIVE �, <br /> ' lan stated tha they had their annual meeting with#he Hennepin�ounty Sheri£�s <br /> McMil <br /> Water Patrol,which er3�orces the LMCD code on the lake. Overall cc3�e enforcemen <br /> went well. They had a sa�fe summer, except for fihe Jul 2002°;One loss ble causa wou da <br /> significant increase in BUI'S�wrth 67 in 2003 vs. 22 in �r P <br /> be the good weather. The wate.r patrol campaigned thisFyear to address underage drinking <br /> on the lake,which led to a signifi�ant increase in cit�t�ons,�vith 87 in 2003 vs. 30 in 2002. <br /> g <br /> Licensed deputy and special patrol��iours totaled 4;�00 on Lake Minnetonka,which came <br /> to about 85°/a of enforcement time for�he en�e counfy. The percentage time was <br /> consistent with what they've done in th�a`st. They had about 33 special deputies <br /> (volunteers),which is down with their.rhour.s totaling 800 in 2003. They felt 33 was a <br /> good number of special deputies.��iennepin"'Couniy has not yet determined if they'll fund <br /> enough of the budget to haverth�two extra dep�t�es next summer as well. They should <br /> know by the end of December. � <br /> ,,� �. <br /> Murphy asked if th,e.�icrease in BUI has to do with incr�.ased enforcement. McMillan <br /> stated they had t�e same number of deputies last sunimer.�5;ansevere stated he believed <br /> they stepped,u�enforcement of BUI after the Big Islan.d probl'��s over July 4ch <br /> �� <br /> � . <br /> �� � <br /> . PiTBLIC COMNIEN'TS . _ <br /> �` � . <br /> � None. <br /> .. _..._...___-�:�,..o,...�.�.�,,..�..�.�..,.ti-�,�R�.,w.�:.�...y.,�,.....�.�,.---- -�Y...�...�,..�, _.. <br /> ZOKII�IG ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT � <br /> 3. #02-2829 Orono Zoning Code Amendment--Section 78-71—Regulation of � <br /> Nonconforming Uses and Nonconforming Structures <br /> Gaffron stated that the Plarming Commission had been working on this Zoning Code <br /> amendment for aboufi two years. The intent was to add standards for nonconforming <br /> structures, The current draft was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Public . <br /> . Hearing held on November 17 . They recomm.ended approyal with a unanimous vote. <br /> The draft accomplishes three things: a pu�P ses and non oniiforming struotur�s dTtseP ates <br /> section, and standards for nonconfomung <br /> the provisions pertaini.ng to "Nonconforming Uses"from those pertaining to <br /> "Nonconforming Structures." It eliminates language that makes the existing section <br /> pertinent only to uses, not structures•use of land not nvo I ing atstruc�ture or irnvolv n� a <br /> provision for lawful nonconformmg . <br /> structure with value less than$3000 on 1-1-75. It eliminates langua�e that suggests <br /> Council would�look favorably on the granting of variances�vhere a situation existed <br /> legally under laws prior to 1975. It distinguishes between"Involuntary Destruction" and <br /> 2 <br />