My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-2009 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
08-10-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 9:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:49:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 10, 2009 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #09 -3417 STEPHENAND SUSAN MOSELEY, 1635 BOHNS POINT ROAD, Continued) <br />White asked what changes have been made to the plans since the Planning Commission meeting. <br />Curtis stated the garage has been moved forward four feet, which has resulted in the shortening of the <br />retaining wall and reducing the hardcover slightly. Another change is the elimination of the deck off of <br />the great room and moving it to the other side of the house. In addition, the applicant has agreed to <br />change the existing patio to permeable pavers but the driveway would remain as is based on the <br />recommendation of the City Engineer. <br />Moseley noted the hardcover on the lot overall has decreased. <br />McMillan asked whether there are any contingencies planned in the event there are major issues found <br />with the foundation. <br />Curtis stated it would depend on what the degree of repair would be. <br />Bremer commented that typically a minor repair is not something that the Council would need to see but <br />that any significant repairs would need to come back before the City Council. <br />Moseley stated they are relying on their engineer's opinion as it relates to the foundation. <br />• Bremer asked whether the Council would be able to review the revised plans prior to approving the <br />resolution. <br />Curtis indicated Staff did receive the revised plans today but that the City Engineer has not yet had an <br />opportunity to review the plans. <br />Kellogg stated one of the main issues with the property is proper drainage and drainage to the north. <br />Moseley commented their current roof is a butterfly roof and by changing it to a peak roof, that would <br />actually help the drainage flow the other way. <br />Murphy noted on Exhibit A the existing houses on either side of this property are set back considerably <br />from this residence and that another story would be added to the structure, which will raise the roofline. <br />Moseley pointed out they are adding a half -story. <br />Murphy asked how the sight line for the neighbor to the north would be impacted and whether that <br />neighbor is in favor of the project. <br />Moseley indicated there are a number of arborvitaes that help screen the property and that the neighbor is <br />aware of the project and is in favor of it. <br />Curtis stated she did speak with the neighbor at 1639 Bohns Point, which is located to the north, and that <br />his initial concern was with the location of the deck, which has now been eliminated. Curtis stated that <br />neighbor has not raised any other concerns. <br />• <br />PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.