My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2009 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
07-13-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 9:48:21 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:48:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lj <br />-A <br />V <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2009 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*4. #09 -3410 JACK W. SAFAR, 980 FERNDALE ROAD WEST — VARIANCE — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5850 <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5850, a Resolution Granting . <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78 -1279, 78 -1288, 78- 1608(3)(c), for the Property <br />Located at 980 Ferndale Road West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*5. #09 -3412 CORTNEY SCOTT LeNEAVE ON BEHALF OF CORTNEY WAYNE <br />LeNEAVE, 360 WAKEFIELD ROAD — SUBDIVISION — SKETCH PLAN <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application #09 -3412, Cortney Scott LeNeave on behalf <br />of Cortney Wayne LeNeave, 360 Wakefield Road, to the July 27, 2009, City Council meeting at the <br />request of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. APPEAL OF ZONING VIOLATION - 4450 SPRUCE WAY <br />Curtis stated Staff did a drive -by inspection of the property located at 4450 Spruce Way following a <br />complaint to the City. The property inspection confirmed that two Express Delivery trucks were parked <br />at the residence and the word "Express" was printed on their address marker sign. <br />A letter was sent to the property owner with notification that commercial use of residential property is <br />governed by City Code 78 -1376 regarding home occupations. The office of the business may be housed <br />within their residence but the remaining business activity is not permitted. While the property does not <br />fully meet the definition of a dispatch center as listed within 78 -1376, Staff feels this business falls under <br />the category of prohibited home occupations since the traffic level it potentially generates is similar to a <br />dispatch center. Mr. Frazier is appealing staff's interpretation of the home occupation. <br />Curtis stated in cases where it is unclear whether a home occupation should be classed as a Level 1 or <br />Level 2, the zoning administrator shall make the determination, which is then subject to City Council <br />confirmation if requested by the operator of the home occupation. In this instance, it is unclear whether <br />the homeowner is operating a Level 2 business, but it is Staff's opinion the homeowner is operating a <br />home business that does not qualify as either a Level 1 or a Level 2. <br />Council is asked to review the information provided and make a determination whether the business <br />qualifies as a Level I or II or should be prohibited. <br />isCurtis stated she does have photographs available for review. <br />PAGE 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.