My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2009 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-22-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 9:47:45 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:47:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY .COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 22, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. MYRTLEWOOD UTILITYIMPROVEMENTS PROJECT ASSESSMENT HEARING, <br />Continued) <br />Gaffron stated the City does not have an ordinance requiring property owners to abandon their wells if <br />water main improvements are completed on their property but that state laws require either a well be <br />maintained and operated or abandoned and properly sealed. <br />Ryan asked if the exact assessment would be determined this evening and noted that the Myrtlewood <br />neighbors do not want to have to bear any portion of the costs to extend the service to 850 and 875 <br />Wayzata Boulevard. <br />Kellogg stated the bid form contains a breakout of the costs for both the water and the sewer mains and <br />that the Council has the option tonight to adopt the assessment roll and then approve the bid and award <br />the work. Kellogg noted the work for 850 and 875 Wayzata has been separated out and is included in a <br />separate bid. <br />Lori Paulson, 30 Myrtlewood Road, asked whether this contractor has done work in Orono previously. <br />Kellogg stated this contractor has not done any work in the City before but that their references are very <br />good and that they have done a number of similar projects. <br />Ryan asked if the work would entail any damage to landscaping and who would bear the costs to repair <br />. the damage. <br />Kellogg noted the majority of the work would be done via directional boring and that they would be <br />contacting each individual property owner about where the work will be completed on their lot and that <br />there is some leeway on where the services would go. Restoration of disturbed areas is included in the <br />contract. <br />Mayor White closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. <br />a. Adopt Assessment Roll — Resolution No. 5844 <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTIO NO. 5844, a Resolution Adopting the <br />Proposed Assessment for the Myrtlewood Utility Improvements Project. <br />Kellogg noted all ten residents would be assessed for the water main project as part of this motion. <br />McMillan stated she has some concerns regarding the costs for both projects, and noted that there are also <br />additional costs for the grinder pump and the sewer connection, which could increase the total costs to <br />over $17,000. McMillan noted the water main would add another $10,000 on top of that. <br />Kellogg stated the City has historically allowed the resident to pay all the costs at the time of hook -up if <br />they do not want to connect now or to have the costs assessed over a number of years. <br />Ryan indicated that all the residents in the Myrtlewood neighborhood::are in agreement with the sewer <br />• work but that not everyone is in agreement on the water portion of the project. Ryan stated in his opinion <br />the best solution would be to allow the residents to opt out of the project if they so choose. <br />. PAGE 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.