My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-2009 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2009
>
04-15-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 9:40:42 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:40:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />Wednesday, April 15, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />underpaid, but unfortunately he has resided in his house seven years and is in essence making up the <br />difference and is on the upside. <br />White stated that is one reason why they eliminated that cap because it did create inequalities. <br />O'Donoghue indicated he would contact the Assessor's Office and speak with them. <br />Murphy stated the City Council does look at trends and that the trends are down, which will create some <br />tax breaks for the residents next year. <br />McMillan commented the lag affect helps cities do their budgeting but is a negative for the property <br />owners. <br />O'Donoghue asked how true and accurate the predicted value is over time. <br />Kunik indicated they are in the process of setting the estimated market value, which is based on sales that <br />took place from October 1, 2007, to September 30, 2008, which is how they arrive at that number. <br />O'Donoghue asked whether any study has been done on the previous years projected values. <br />Kunik indicated the Assessor's Office is fairly close on their projected values to the actual values. <br />Murphy noted there was a referendum passed by the Orono School District, which has also increased the <br />residents' taxes. <br />An audience member asked whether the Assessor's Office takes foreclosures into account. <br />Stulc indicated they do not take foreclosures into account. <br />Franchot noted the Assessor's Office takes arms length sales into consideration. <br />The audience member commented that there were a number of residences where the sales price of the <br />property was escalated. Then when the house goes.into foreclosure, it is not a true valuation when it sold. <br />The resident questioned whether much research has gone into the Assessor's comparables to see whether <br />they were part of a fraud. <br />White stated unfortunately the Board of Equalization does not have time to discuss issues like that, but <br />suggested the resident contact the Assessor's Office. <br />5. Mark and Bonnie Hector, 3265 Carman Road, PID 20- 117 -23 14 0011 <br />Mrs. Hector indicated she has been involved in real estate for the past 14 years and has spoken with the <br />Assessor's Office several times. Their house is located on a cove and is not directly on the lake. <br />Assessor Stulc only provided them with comparisons for lakeshore on Casco Point, which is valued <br />considerably higher than a cove lakeshore. Hector noted they cannot swim in the cove and they have low <br />water levels with a mucky bottom. <br />• Hector stated she pulled together six comparables, made some adjustments for busy roads and lakeshore <br />that is located across a busy road, which does impact the value. Stulc spoke about acreage, and their <br />PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.