Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 28, 2002 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(BOYER BUILDING CORPORATION; Continued) <br />Gappa explained that this number was based on the average of 10 typical properties within the <br />City, taking the total cost of the stormwater improvements and dividing that by the acres, thereby <br />using the 2 -acre district as the base, factoring up and_ down from there. <br />Murphy asked staff whether they felt comfortable that, when they arrived at these numbers, they <br />were fair and equitable and they could live with them. <br />Kellogg confirmed Murphy's statement. <br />Murphy stated that he was glad to hear that the $2,700 figure was not an arbitrary number, that <br />staff had used a valid equation to determine the fee, and Gaffron was able to reach a reasonable <br />conclusion that supports the $10,000 fee. <br />White asked the applicant if this scenario was similar in other communities. <br />Boyer indicated that he had not been faced with this issue before and was not clear whether other <br />communities assessed this fee or not. He felt it was examined on a per site basis and in most <br />instances, the developer creates their own retention or stormwater pond whereby the concern is <br />moot. <br />Mayor Peterson asked staff if they could foresee other developments this could affect. <br />Gaffron stated that the Dahlstrom parcel could be affected, as would other sites in the future. <br />Dave Tuax, resident, stated that, in other municipalities, if you are trying to relate this to the <br />installation costs of sanitary sewer, they often use a linear foot of roadside as a.yardstick. <br />Kellogg commented that, in his opinion, the earlier statement that compares the park dedication <br />fees to stormwater trunk fees, was like comparing apples to oranges. Park Dedication fees are <br />based on the number of users that are going to impact the park, whereas, the stormwater trunk <br />fee cannot be based on the per unit fee because there are many issues that are not being <br />addressed when you develop a natural area. Since there will be runoff into -the natural wetland <br />area, what is going to happen downstream from this development, the natural wetland is going to <br />change once this site develops, and Kellogg didn't believe it fair to base the fee on a per unit <br />basis, and instead he suggested it continue to be reviewed on an area basis. <br />Based on the table supplied by Gaffron, Mayor Peterson pointed out that the SW &DT fees would <br />be paid for by new development. <br />Murphy clarified that, it seemed to him, the formula revolves around the City being able to <br />reasonably account for all the costs of moving stormwater and drainage from all of Orono, <br />40 through the City, and to the lake. He pointed out that this formula is based merely on a <br />proportionate share of that total cost, it has <br />PAGE 9 of 20 <br />