06-28-2004 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2004 7:00 o'clock p.m. (PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) • Although there is no one easy solution to this problem, McMillan stated that the City needs to come up with something to resolve this for these people. Sansevere asked why staff couldn't just host a face to face meeting to explain to these residents how simple running the pipe across the back of their properties would be. Mayor Paterson asked if the Council and staff could all agree that this is something that will be resolved yet this fall. Gappa agreed. The Council unanimously concurred. Mrs. Nusbaum thanked the Council for their time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *5. #04 -2969 TERRY AND GRETCHEN BLOUNT, 1390 CHERRY PLACE — VARIANCES /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION NO. 5200 White moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5200, a Resolution amending Resolution #5127 granting a hardcover variance and a building -to- building setback variance for 1390 Cherry Place to allow construction of a covered entry with the • remodel project. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 6. #04 -2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLP, WILLOW /12 (STONEBAY OUTLOT A) — GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FINAL PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 5201, ORDINANCE NO. 14, 3RD SERIES Gaffron explained that the Applicants have requested General Development Plan Approval and Final Plat Approval, as well as, Ordinance Rezoning subject to its not becoming effective until all required documents have been executed to the satisfaction of staff and the City Attorney. Gaffron pointed out that the applicants had provided mylars for final plat approval and final building materials boards reflecting the darker brick as directed. He questioned whether the Council wished to include evergreens along the 400 -500' Highway 12 frontage. Gaffron indicated that the applicant's attorney has suggested a number of minor changes to the Preliminary Plat Resolution and the General Concept Plan Approval Resolution adopted on June 14. While most of the changes are inconsequential and under review by the Attorney and staff, Gaffron stated that Reliance Development Company LLC is assigning their interests to a replacement entity, Stonebay Commercial LLC, for legal purposes, and documents will be revised to reflect those changes. In addition, the applicant's attorney has requested that the rezoning ordinance add to the list of allowed uses a final line item, " #29 other non -food retail uses ". Gaffron pointed out that staff has rejected this requested change given the amount of time devoted by the Planning Commission in establishing this list of allowed uses. He stated that if an unlisted use is requested, staff would reject it and the applicant could appeal staff's interpretation and request n U PAGE to of 19