My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-2004 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
01-12-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 8:20:44 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 8:10:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2004 <br />4. #02 -2961 Nina Wildman, 745 Spring Hill Road — Preliminary Plat Approval — <br />Resolution No. 5099 <br />Gaffron stated that Council had approved the concept of the proposed subdivision with no <br />requirement to upgrade the existing road outside the property boundaries, and with no <br />requirement to dedicate wider right -of -ways for the existing road outside the property <br />boundaries, subject to further discussion among all parties to clear up access /easement <br />issues, and directed staff to draft a resolution. <br />The applicant's surveyor indicated that the traveled, paved portion of the driveway curves <br />to the south before reaching the Hawn property east of the end of the cartway. It would <br />appear that there is no undue encroachment of the Hawn property. He also notes that <br />within the Winston property, the driveway appears to extend outside the boundaries of its <br />dedicated easement. This will have to be rectified prior to final plat approval by moving <br />the driveway or re- defining the easement. <br />Staff has some concern that the 12' proposed paved width of the one -way private road <br />loop in Outlot A may need to be widened for adequate emergency vehicle access. A <br />condition has been included in the resolution requiring Fire Marshal and City Engineer <br />approval of the final design. <br />An item that came up in discussion was whether utilities were within the easement <br />• corridor and whether they crossed into the neighbors' properties. The easement issue <br />needs to be dealt with. Gaffron suggested adding language (in bold) on page 9 of 10 of <br />the resolution, item G where it says, "Documentation sufficient to satisfy the City <br />Attorney that the property has legal roadway access and utility easements to Spring Hill <br />Road..." <br />n <br />U <br />Gaffron stated that the draft resolution requires no road upgrades and no easement <br />expansions between Spring Hill Road and the property, and that no off -site road <br />easements be granted to the City until they get to the actual property. This is consistent <br />with a number of past subdivisions, but not with the most recent one on Brown Road <br />South where they held up a subdivision until they could prove they had a 50' access to <br />convey to the City. <br />Bob Carlson of 201 East Lake Street, Suite 241, Wayzata, asked if the Park Dedication <br />fees could be paid following the building permits, instead of up front with the subdivision <br />because not all of the lots are intended to be developed. <br />Gaffron stated that they used to do that, but it got confusing, so they switched to requiring <br />the fees with the subdivision. <br />Mr. Carlson stated that one lot might be joined to another and never built on. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.