My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2004 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
12-13-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2012 2:45:30 PM
Creation date
5/31/2012 2:45:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2004 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• (9. #04 -3052 ERIC VOGSTROM, 2618 CASCO POINT ROAD, Continued) <br />hardship. The City has generally established that for very small lots the minimum reasonable <br />garage/house footprint is 1,500 square feet. It is likely impossible to construct a 1,500 square foot house <br />on this site within the 25 percent limit. Therefore, Staff will conceptually support a 1,500 square foot <br />home with minimal decks, sidewalk and driveway needed to support it, but Staff feels this can be done in <br />the range of 30 percent hardcover, not 36 percent. Staff is not convinced that the third garage stall is <br />necessary. <br />Curtis stated a letter was received today from Timothy Keane, attorney for the applicant, and has been <br />distributed to the Council. <br />Gaffron addressed the City Council concerning the size of the house and footprint. Gaffron stated the lot <br />is sloped towards the lake and has approximately an 8 -foot difference from the lakeside of the proposed <br />house to the street side of the proposed house, would ideally accommodate a walk -out and a two and a <br />half story house without exceeding any height limits and without excess grading. Gaffron stated a <br />footprint of 1,500 square feet with a two -stall garage could be constructed. If the applicant would like to <br />retain the three -car garage, the first story could be reduced by 200 square feet, for a final square footage <br />of 4,700 square feet. <br />Gaffron indicated the shape of this lot lends itself to a home up to 55 -60' in width and also allows for a <br />home to be angled so that it takes the best advantage of lake views. Additionally, the home could be <br />placed with the garage at the 30' minimum setback from the road to minimize driveway hardcover. The <br />• additional area of 0 -75' zone that is non - contiguous is a benefit to this property but cannot be considered <br />as creating a hardship situation. No hardcover credit should be accrued to this excess lakeshore square <br />footage. <br />Sansevere inquired why the applicant is so reluctant to agree to 1,500. Sansevere noted he personally <br />would not agree to anything above 1,500. <br />Vogstrom stated he is unclear about some of the items in Staff's report. Vogstrom indicated page three of <br />the memorandum lists a couple of properties that are smaller than his lot, both of which were granted a <br />larger footprint. Vogstrom pointed out part of the basis for the approval on those two properties was the <br />fact that they are located on a busy road. Vogstrom noted his property is also located on a very busy road. <br />Vogstrom stated he meets all required setbacks, with the house being located 85' from the lake, and that <br />he is requesting the additional hardcover to accommodate a third stall on the garage. Vogstrom indicated <br />he has reduced the size of the proposed residence in order to have a three -stall garage. Vogstrom stated <br />he is not sure how the city planner arrived at the square footage for the house. <br />McMillan stated the planner included the garage in the calculation. <br />Sansevere stated the City Council needs to be consistent with their approvals and that they may set a <br />precedent if they approve the additional hardcover. <br />Vogstrom stated in his view the Council would be consistent in granting the 34.5 percent hardcover given <br />the other two lots that were granted higher hardcover. Vogstrom stated 66 percent of his lot is located <br />within the 0 -75', with one of the examples of hardship cited in the memorandum being the fact that 50 <br />• percent of the lot was located in the 0 -75' zone. Vogstrom stated in his opinion some of the hardship <br />criteria found in the other two applications apply to his lot. <br />PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.