My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-2004 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-27-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2012 2:40:40 PM
Creation date
5/31/2012 2:40:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 27, 2004 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( *7. #04 -3051 KEVIN AND JULIE FITZPATRICK, 356 WESTLAKE STREET, Continued) <br />While Gundlach pointed out that two neighbors, the Shields and the Ericksons, had submitted <br />letters as to why they would object to the application, staff felt this applicant's request was within <br />his rights. In addition, Gundlach was pleased to note that the applicant was addressing the <br />engineering issues prior to construction. <br />Sansevere questioned why Planning Commissioner Jurgens did not find a hardship to support the <br />application. <br />Commissioner Kempf stated that he believed Jurgens felt that lot size was not sufficient hardship. <br />Sansevere questioned whether the applicant's request was consistent with what had been granted in <br />the past. <br />Gaffron confirmed that most 50' lots requesting variances in the 1 -acre or 2 -acre zone have been <br />approved over the years, stating that it would not be unusual for the City to grant this request as it <br />would be similar to those granted on Eastlake Street. <br />Murphy asked why the neighborhood was zoned 2 -acre minimum. <br />• <br />Gaffron summarized the fact that, while the area was platted into 50' lots in 1912, the Orono <br />zoning districts were not put in effect until the 1950's, with the entire City undergoing rezoning in <br />1975. He maintained that no standards for setbacks existed when these homes were first built; . <br />therefore, smaller lots do exist within the 2 -acre zones that don't fit the new zoning limitations. <br />Murphy questioned how the Council could enforce the 2 -acre standard on a lot this size. He <br />believed a small house should be built on this small lot, that the house was too tall, and that there <br />was inadequate hardship to support the request. <br />Mr. Fitzpatrick pointed out that the home met the new height requirements passed just this evening <br />by the City Council. He shared the side elevations for Council review to support this position. <br />Gaffron maintained that homesites similar to this scenario exist in several locations throughout <br />Orono, including Eastlake Street, Baldur Park Road, and Highwood. <br />White added that Casco Point also has similar building situations; however, none have out <br />buildings. <br />Sansevere indicated that he believed it rare that the Council has used the size of the lot as a <br />hardship. <br />Attorney Barrett stated that, while the lot is too small for its zoning, past practices have not denied <br />people the ability to build on a lot this size, especially when there is a house that currently exists on <br />the property. <br />LJ <br />PAGE 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.