My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2004 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-26-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2012 2:09:51 PM
Creation date
5/31/2012 2:09:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 26, 2004 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• 7. #04 -2993 CHRIS VALERIUS AND PHIL FISK, 2377 SHADYWOOD ROAD — Continued <br />White stated that he did not like the plan which includes a drive - through circling around a home in <br />Orono. He didn't feel it looked good, did not fit there, and no hardship could warrant the request. <br />He reiterated that a drive - through was inappropriate for this site. <br />Murphy agreed, stating that there was no hardship to grant additional hardcover of 10 -20 %. He <br />indicated that he was present during the Planning Commission discussion and found their <br />recommendation to be well thought out. <br />Sansevere reiterated that the city is bound by law to find a hardship to warrant the hardcover <br />request. <br />McMillan stated that, while she could empathize with their desire for a drive - through in the <br />competitive coffee house industry, the logistics of this site just won't work. <br />Mark Cox, 3509 Ivy Place, urged the Council to not lose sight of the fact that the community of <br />Navarre would unlikely support another coffee house. He objected to the applicant trying to skirt <br />the letter of the law, especially when the need is not there and could cause both businesses to fail. <br />While Murphy questioned their choice to locate in Navarre, he stated that no one knows whether <br />one of the shops would fail or not. <br />• Cox reiterated that hardcover, hardship, adequate parking, and the question of the drive - through are <br />great issues. In addition, he asked where a dumpster pad would be placed. <br />U <br />Gundlach stated that the applicants would have parking in the lot behind the site; however, the <br />hardcover and setback variances would still apply. She indicated that adequate square footage <br />would remain for the dumpster pad if the applicant's were granted the plan without the drive - <br />through. <br />Jeremy Thompson, Mound resident, stated that as a customer of Lake Country Coffee, he believed <br />that a drive - through would be a great plus and advantage for him. He pointed out that Culvers has <br />a drive - through that circles the entire building and he didn't feel this should be such a big issue for <br />this odd house. <br />Fisk added that most McDonalds have drive - through lanes that circle the entire building past their <br />entryways. <br />Mayor Peterson polled the Council members and found that none objected to the first request for <br />the addition; however, all objected to the second request for the drive - through and parking setback. <br />McMillan felt that the applicants would need more than three designated parking spaces upfront. <br />Fisk maintained that during their peak hours of 5a.m. to 9 a.m., use of the shared parking lot would <br />not be problem. He did not feel they would require any dedicated parking. <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.