My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2012 1:54:57 PM
Creation date
5/31/2012 1:54:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 22, 2004 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• (16. 2765 KELLEY PARKWAY — DENTAL OFFICE SIGN HEIGHT continued) <br />Gaffron stated that the address could be addressed. Berg responded that he could speak with <br />his partners. <br />Gaffron stated in staff's opinion the sign at 12' or 12' 8" is pushing the limit, especially for <br />an office use. <br />White suggested making the Orono Professional Center in smaller letters or putting on a <br />lower sign and then the tenant names could be larger. <br />Sansevere stated the sign exceeded and interrupted the roofline and it would be more <br />visually pleasing if one -foot lower. <br />Murphy stated the Council has gone a long way on previous issues related to this project. <br />Applicant Berg also stated they went a long way. <br />Murphy moved and Mayor Peterson moved to deny the application based on staff's <br />recommendation that the sign not exceed the 12' 8" height approved with the building <br />permit. VOTE: Ayes 4; Nays 0. <br />• 11. #04 -2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT CORP., HIGHWAY 12/WILLOW <br />DRIVE (OUTLOT A, STONEBAY) — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />• <br />Gaffron explained Planning Commission tabled this item on February 17 pending a joint <br />work session with the Long Lake Planning Commission, which was held on March 3. At <br />that work session, the commissions exchanged information about current and pending <br />activities along the Highway 12 corridor, and discussed whether rezoning of this site might <br />impact redevelopment efforts in Long Lake. Each commissioner in attendance drew his/her <br />own conclusions regarding that discussion. <br />On February 17, Planning Commission also established a list of acceptable uses for the <br />property if it is rezoned. The Planning Commission refined this on March 15. <br />Murphy inquired what the list of uses meant. Gaffron responded by saying that when the <br />property is rezoned there will be a list of allowed uses for this property and if any approved <br />uses on the list become a drive -thru there would be CUP on the permit. <br />On March 15, Planning Commission concentrated primarily on determining whether to <br />recommend that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to re -guide the site to allow primarily <br />retail uses, rather than the primarily office uses for which the site is currently guided. <br />PAGE 15 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.