My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#6447-variance-2014
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
E
>
Elmwood Avenue
>
1141 Elmwood Avenue - 07-117-23-14- 0027
>
Resolutions
>
#6447-variance-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:31:23 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 4:20:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1141
Street Name
Elmwood
Street Type
Avenue
Address
1141 Elmwood Ave
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0711723140027
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ �O�O <br /> CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � <br /> ti � <br /> �� G' No. 64 � � <br /> �kEs H o�� <br /> � <br /> FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 14-3675. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District. <br /> 3. The Applicants have submitted a proposed building site plan for a new residence <br /> that meets all required setbacks with the exception of the average lakeshore <br /> setback. The Property has municipal public sewer available, which the new <br /> residence will be connected. The proposed impervious surface coverage meets all <br /> hardcover location and square foota�e restrictions of the Zoning Chapter and the <br /> total proposed square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the <br /> entire lot area. The proposed house wil] be required to meet all other zoning <br /> district standards. <br /> 4. With regards to the criteria established for granting variances and specifically the <br /> requested average setback variance, Council makes the following findings: <br /> a) The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a <br /> reasonable manner; however, the proposed use is not permitted by <br /> the official controls. The Applicants have requested to build a home in a <br /> residential district, which is consistent with the underlying zoning and <br /> comprehensive plan. <br /> b) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his <br /> property not created by the landowner. The Applicants did not create <br /> the lot. <br /> The situation is unique because tlie p1•oposed home is located furtlier from <br /> the lake than the house located to the south. The lot to the north is vacant, <br /> but the house on the nonriparian lot uphill from it is being used to <br /> calculate the average lakeshore setback because the northern lot is subject <br /> to a lot combination agreement. But for the lot combination agreement on <br /> the lot to the north, and utilizing the location of the house on the <br /> nonriparian lot, the Applicants could build this house without a variance. <br /> The lot combination agreement on the lot to the north would not have <br /> been discfosed to the Applicants at the time they purchased their current <br /> home. Further the (ots to the north have separate PIDs and would lead an <br /> adjacent property owner to believe the 1•ipa�•ian lot is vacant. <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> 17&�56v' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.