Laserfiche WebLink
.��� <br /> �� \\ <br /> �:''� � ' V \'�� <br /> ///� � <br /> � - � CITY of I�RON� <br /> � � �� � � <br /> �,i <br /> �� �,'�/,�' RESOLUTIOIV OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> \�SH�j// NO. � � <br /> avera�e lot area of developed 1al:eshore lots �ti�ithin 1000' either side of Lot 7 is <br /> approximately 33,100 s.f. or tnree times the area of Lot 7. The average width of the <br /> 21 developed lakeshore lots�-ithin 1000'either side ofLot 7 is appro;cimately 80-90', <br /> nearly double the �0' width of Lot 7. While de�-eloped lots in the neijhborhood on <br /> average fall short of the area and�,vidth standards of the LR-1B district, the area and <br /> width of Lot 7 are estremel�- substandard when compared to the nei�hborhood <br /> average, disregarding the LR-1B standards. v <br /> d) "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the propert}� exists under the terms of this (the Zoning) <br /> Chapter". Since reasonable we for this propem� does exist, and since that use has <br /> been enjoyed by this and prior property o�vners for the past 30 years or more, <br /> economic considerations are not a valid hardship in this application. <br /> 16. The Council finds that grantin� of the application is not necessary for the preservation and <br /> enjoyment of a substantial property ri�ht of the owner. Granting of the proposed variance <br /> would be contrary to the intent of the zoninQ code; because it would allow for development <br /> density not in keepina with the intent of the LR-1B District. The grantin� of the requested <br /> variances would merely se�ve as a con�-enience to the applicant, and no tmdue hardship has <br /> been demonstrated that would support the variance request. <br /> FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby <br /> approves the request of the applicant for a ��ariance to Zonins Code Section 10.03 Subd. 9(A.) to <br /> allo�x� Special Lo± Combir.ation to allo��� fo: the per�ar.ent use of Lot 7 for lake access for 1169 <br /> North Arm Drive, includina the ability to const:uct a dock on Lot 7 ��%ithout a principal structure, <br /> based on the followinQ findinas: <br /> A. Undue hardship exists because, �vithout the continued ability to use Lot 7 for <br /> lake access as it has been used for the past 30 ��ears or longer, the property o�vner <br /> would be denied a substantial property right and «-ould be denied reasonable use oi <br /> the property as it has historicall�� bzen used. <br /> B. The close pro�imity of Lot 7 to 1169 North Arm Drive will allow for the o�vner to <br /> previde reasonable security for the dock facilitiec on Lot 7, thereby alleviatinQ the <br /> P2ae 6 of 7 <br />