Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
--� <br /> ,i�—���; <br /> ;'� ��\ <br /> �� �� <br /> ��b. - C ITY of �RONO <br /> (� - -� �) <br /> �,,; <br /> \�� G'�/,% RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `\`glf�g���/ NO. � � � � <br /> �� <br /> 1. As of January l, 197� the property has been zoned LR-1B, One-Famil�� Lakeshore <br /> Re�idential Zoning District, requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area and 140 feet mini:-.um «-idth. <br /> Based on the zoning district's required performance standards, the proposed use of the �-opem- as <br /> a residential buildable lot would require the followintr variances: <br /> aj Lot Area <br /> Required = 1 acre or 43,�60 s.f. <br /> Existing = 0.2�� acre or 11,100 s.f. <br /> Variance = 0.7�5 acre or 32,460 s.f. (74.�%) <br /> b) Lot Width <br /> Required= 140' <br /> Existing = 51' <br /> Variance = 89' (63.�%) <br /> ?. Prior to 197�,the property w�as zoned R-1 C,effective since September 14, 1967.�re:idential <br /> ��one requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area and 140 feet minimum width. <br /> 3. Per the assessment policy of the 1970-1 sewer district, Lot 7 ��,-as assessed for :�i' of front <br /> footage at $7.80 per front foot, a total of$390, but �vas not charged the $2�� Pi�nt CharQe <br /> nor the$1270 tinit charae,because the property did not contain a dwelling. The��sessment <br /> for front footaae did not act to grant atitomatic buildabilitv to Lot 7. <br /> =�. L.ot 7 and the property at 1169 North Arm Drive (PINS �07-117-23 14 0060� have been <br /> o���ned in common since 1971 or earlier. Lot 7 and the property at 1169 North_�rrri Dri�-e <br /> are not directly across Elm�vood Avenue from each other but are offset by aprro�imatelv <br /> 1�0'. In 1971,the then o���ier Gary Beito applied for lot area and �vidth ti�arianc;.�for Lot i. <br /> indicatinQ in a�vritten statement that "We purchased This lot for access to the la��e kno«�in� <br /> the current codes did not pennit buildin�."The requested variances��-ere subsequenti� denied <br /> b�� tne City Council, based on the fact that there �vere other vacant lots adjacent�,;� it, ��nich <br /> could potentiallti be purchased and combined to make a more conforminQ 1ot. <br /> �. The condition of tne property and the zoning standards have not chanQed since:^e��ariance <br /> denial in 1971 to make a findina of a ne�v hardship. <br /> Paae ? of 7 <br />