Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2003 <br />• *7. #03 -2866A David & Judy Zoschke, 2040 Shadywood Road — Appeal of <br />Administrative Decision —Final Action <br />Sansevere moved, and White seconded, that in the appeal by Judy and David <br />Zoschke, #03- 2866A, the City Council hereby confirms the findings and conclusions <br />of the Planning Commission as noted in the staff memo to Council dated December <br />4, 2003. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*8. #03 -2943 Robert & Janet Labalt, 3202 North Shore Drive — Variance (Revised <br />Proposal) — Resolution No. 5090 <br />Sansevere moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5090 granting <br />variances to Orono Municpal Zoning Code Sections 78- 330(B), 78 -282, and 78- <br />1288(B) in order to construct an attached tuck under garage with 2 stories of living <br />space above on the walk -out side of the home attached to the existing one story walk- <br />out home. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*9. #03 -2951 Judith and James Pierpont, 1849 and 1801 West Farm Road —Lot <br />Line Rearrangement — Resolutions No. 5091 & 5092 <br />• Sansevere moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5091, approving a <br />Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Properties Located at 1801 and 1849 <br />West Farm Road, #03 -2951. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />• <br />Sansevere moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5092, approving the <br />Vacation of a Dedicated Drainage & Utility Easement Within Lots 14 & 15, Block 1, <br />The Farm at Long Lake, #03 -2951. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />10. #03 -2961 Nina Wildman, 745 Spring Hill Road — Preliminary Subdivision <br />Gaffron stated that the application was for preliminary plat approval. The 24 -acre <br />property was set back from Spring Hill Road and gained access through two other <br />properties. The property was being subdivided into 3 lots, with the existing house on lot <br />1, the driveway NNith a loop, tennis court, and guesthouse. The applicant proposed <br />building a new house on lot 2, and leaving lot 3 as a buildable lot. All lots met the <br />standards for the zone as buildable lots with septic. <br />The Planning Commission felt the subdivision was reasonable, but had issues with the <br />access. Lot 3 would require a width variance where it abuts a private road. A small <br />portion of the driveway loop would require a hardcover variance where it comes within <br />G1 <br />