Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2003 <br />• PUBLIC COMMENTS — Continued <br />Gaffron read from the ordinance that parking in a residential district of vehicles in excess <br />of 14,000 pounds requires: a lot size of 5- acres, property owner must be vehicle owner or <br />operator, vehicle must be set back 50' from property lines, must not be visible from <br />neighboring properties and public streets, maintenance shall occur within a closed <br />building, vehicle shall not create a nuisance of any kind, and in a shared driveway <br />situation the City must have on file a signed agreement from all driveway users. <br />White asked if the Tim's share a driveway. Mr. Tim stated that they do. Mrs. Tim stated <br />that they have the property with the barn painted "Class of '04." She stated that Mr. Tim <br />left and returned to the property once each day, and he parks the truck on the south side of <br />the garage. <br />Sansevere asked if the truck could go in the barn. Mr. Tim replied it is not stable enough. <br />Sansevere asked about some kind of grandfathering clause. Barrett stated that this form of <br />regulatory ordinance, in his judgement, did not automatically create a constitutional right <br />to grandfather where a truck is parked on the property. Council could make a decision <br />concerning the issue, but the ordinance itself did not allow for it. <br />• Mayor Peterson asked if Mr. Tim would have to apply for a variance. Barrett stated that <br />Council could amend the ordinance to grandfather or not, as they choose, but the <br />ordinance itself made no allowance for grandfathering. <br />Murphy asked Mr. Tim if his neighbors' had issues with the truck. lair. Tim stated that his <br />neighbor did not like the truck. He stated he tried to be respectful of people. <br />Murphy stated Council should be careful about grandfathering someone without getting <br />all the information they need from any and all concerned parties. He stated that with the <br />6 -month transition period, there was no need to take action at present. <br />Gaffron stated that there was potential for a variance application, which would involve a <br />public hearing, at which time Council would get the chance to hear from neighbors. <br />Mayor Peterson asked how long the % -'ve lived in their home. Mrs. Tim replied they'd <br />been there nine years, and the neighbor for five. <br />Sansevere asked who they dealt with on staff when they requested permission to get the <br />truck. Mrs. Tim replied that person had moved on, but she had a letter from 2003 <br />concerning an in -home occupation. Sansevere stated that if the City approved his use of <br />the truck, the onus fell on the City to work something out. <br />0 Mayor Peterson directed staff to review the matter. <br />7 <br />