My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3191
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3100 - 3199 (March 23, 1992 - November 9, 1992)
>
Resolution 3191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 1:49:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� <br /> E% . <br /> � <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> � �b. � CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� �'�' RE$OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESH�4� . NO. 3191 <br /> at that location. Adjacent portions of the house <br /> currently exist as near as 44' to the shoreline. The <br /> interior layout of the house makes it difficult to <br /> expand the kitchen area without encroaching into the 0- <br /> 75' setback. � <br /> c) The proposed second story addition above the existing <br /> master bedroom, which is 60' from the shoreline, will . <br /> � create no additional hardcover and wil 1 merely create <br /> � new structure above the existing footprint. <br /> - d) ,..' _The , increase in .0-75' hardcover as a result of the , <br /> -_ : , . ;, kitchen addition is 90 s.f. or an increase of 0.3$ <br /> �--� . �- hardconer- in- the 0-75' zone. There is no� extraneous <br /> hardcover in the 0-75' zone that could be removed to <br /> . � � result in no net hardcover increase. <br /> 4. At their October 12, 1992 meeting the City Council . <br /> determined that no net hardcover increase in the 0-75' zone <br /> • was justified. The applicant subsequently agreed to <br /> concurrent removals of 90+ s.f. of sidewalk in the 0-75' <br /> zone to result in no net hardcover increase above the <br /> existing 11.2� level in that zone. � � <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and" recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the . - <br /> � effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. . <br /> 6. IThe City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br /> other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose . a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> � � rieighboring property; would not merely serve ,as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but` is necessary to alleviate <br /> � a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> ` would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> � . Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> . - - . Page 2 of 7. <br /> •� . . . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.