Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING , <br /> Monday, October 17, 2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#OS-3146 Mark and Pamela Palm, Continued) <br /> Brennan stated if the garage structure were located closer to the street, the actual dimensions would <br /> increase,which would allow the garage to renlain at what was originally approved. Brennan indicated as <br /> the garage is moved closer to the street, it would increase the dimensions. <br /> Rahn stated it appears this application may need to be tabled for a redesign. <br /> Bremer inquired what size structure the applicant would like. <br /> Brennan stated he is not familiar with what happened in previous meetings since he only became involved <br /> in this application today. Brennan stated the applicant would like a functional garage. Brennan stated if <br /> the hardcover and side yard setback encroacYunents were required to be reduced, they would like a <br /> structure that is a�propriate for this lot. <br /> Bremer suggested Brennan work with the applicant and table the application. <br /> Brennan stated they would like some feedback from the Planning Commission. <br /> Leslie noted 34 by 22 was approved previously,which equates to 748 feet and satisfies the setback <br /> requirement. <br /> Brennan indicated that size requires a setback of 10 feet. <br /> Bremer stated due to the topography,a front-loading garage was previously determined not to be <br /> appropriate for this lot and that was why it was allowed with that short of setback. Bremer questioned <br /> whether the Planning Commission would be okay with approving what was previously approved. <br /> Rahn inquired whether the siructure would look like what is depicted in the plans. <br /> Brennan stated he would recoirunend the siructure face the street. Brennan indicated it�vould still have <br /> the a�pearance of a single-story structure. <br /> Kempf noted the applicant's driveway is extremely steep and that in his view it could be a very dangerous <br /> situation in the winter. Kempf stated when he stood on the slope and was at the height of the street,his <br /> line of sight was at the roof of the current garage. Kempf suggested the applicant consider a lower level <br /> garage that loaded from the side of the house. Kempf stated a garage that you could drive directly from <br /> the street would make it a safer driveway and would allow for storage underneath the garage. <br /> Brennan stated the one disadvantage would be that you would have to exit froin a stairway into the house. <br /> Kempf suggesied the garage be made wide enough to construct a staircase inside the garage. <br /> Palm stated the previous neighbor had a similar situation and that the walk from the garage to the house <br /> was quite a distance. <br /> PAGE 17 <br />