01-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

was present on his 101. It is unlikely that permilting the relocation of the existing ' deck would sel o precedeni for oiher properries that do no�share this condition. 9."The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." See previous commenl. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Yes. At presenl the enjoyment of ihe lakefroni use is compromised by fhe greot number of sleps up to use facilities rn the house. The relocation of the deck adjacenl io the ouibuilding will create a place of shelter for rhose using the lakefronl, as well as a landing for the new steps from ihe upper poriion of the lot. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." The requested variance sustains a use that is permihied in this zone. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to aileviate demonstrable hardship or di�culty." Yes. As Ihe homeowner and his wife age, fhey will be less and less able io enjoy the lakefronr without a new sel of steps, and hard surface to arrive on, and an outdoor area adjacent to the outbuilding. They would gladly relocate Ihe deck 75'back from the lake if such a spot existed on their lot. Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the unique hardship, practical di�culty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance ' with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): .7`i� :-:t.;f{i�:�"il �"k�'•��@ �p�� ''°��T ��,� � y,J^r 4 ! �,� ��. 1� �} !� �3 L;" �.' 4'�� 6�� - i .�I � ..:��, . t�' �� ` . - � �� ...-