Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> #OS-3135 3165 North Shore Drive '� <br /> January 12,2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Sec. 78-1286. Topographic alterations/grading and filling. <br /> (d} (2) For movement of more than 500 cubic yards of material within the shareland <br /> overlay district, conditional use permit approval by the city council is required in addition to the <br /> required land alteration permit. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> A-Proposed Site Plan-Alternate A-Revised 1-10-OS <br /> B-Proposed Building Plans and Elevations <br /> C-Application for Variance/CUP <br /> D-Hardship Statement <br /> E-Hardcover Calculations by surveyor; Lot coverage calcs by staff <br /> F- City Engineer Comments 1-6-06 <br /> G-Plat Map/Property Owners List <br /> H-Photos <br /> I-Original Plan Subinittal with Correspondence, Staff&Engineer Comments <br /> J-Peter Johnson Comments 1-11-06 <br /> Background <br /> Applicant submitted an application in June 2005 for an average lakeshore setback variance and <br /> CUP for fill exceeding 500 c.y. in order to construct a replacement residence on this conforming <br /> 1.4 acre lot. The original proposal (See Exhibit I) included a 3-level residence with steeply <br /> pitched roofs, and fill of approximately 1350 c.y.,phis an underground garage that they wished <br /> to have considered as non-hardcover. Staff concluded that tlie garage would be considered as <br /> hardcover, and that plan would require a hardcover variance which was highly unlikely. The <br /> adjoining property owner to the south, Maurice Wagener, also expressed concerns about his <br /> potential loss of lake views due to the high peaks. <br /> Applicant has since extended the review period to May 2006 and has recently submitted a <br /> revised building pla�i and site plan(E�iibits A&B), for a flat roof, 2-level home 30' in <br /> maximum height as measured from the existing grade, but requiring 2350 cubic yards of fill at <br /> the rear to allow direct entry to the upper level. <br /> Two access alternatives were initially proposed, each with slightly different hardcover impacts, <br /> but neither requiring a hardcover variance. Alternate A continues the existing access to North <br /> Shore drive for both the driveway circle loop as well as for the underground garage access. <br /> Alternate B had North Shore Drive access for the garage,but Bo1ui's Point Road access for the <br /> circle drive. Staff was advised by Peter Joluison, attorney for Wagener, that the driveway <br /> easement that would be used for Alternate B has been abandoned and is no longer valid, and that <br /> his client will object to Alternate B. The applicant has aclaiowledged that access via Alternate A <br /> is the preferred plan. <br /> Note that the hardcover calculations include the portions of the garage that will be buried, as <br /> staff advised the applicant that tliis will still be considered as hardcover. <br />