Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2003 <br />• 7. #03 -2950 David and Tara Gross, 2635 Countryside Drive West—After-the-Fact <br />Variance Resolution No. 5080— Continued <br />next door neighbor along that property edge. No one had any concerns. They shopped for <br />the court and chose a green one that is not too visually disturbing. He had assumed the <br />sport court company pulled a permit. They assumed he had. The company installed the <br />court and after the grading was done, they put the court at 6' instead of the 12' where it <br />had been flagged for installation. Over the summer, he was approached by Bruce Vang <br />who told him that the court was too close to the property line. He applied for an after -the- <br />fact variance after consulting with an attorney. Mr. Gross stated it looks like they delayed <br />parts of the process, but he responded to every City request promptly and complied with <br />all the deadlines. He offered to plant a row of arborvitae along the property to screen it <br />from the neighbors. The Planning Commission voted against it. He would consider <br />moving the sport court to another spot on the property. He stated the alternate location <br />chosen by the Planning Commission would not work well for them. They could reduce <br />the size of the court at the current location. Or they could do soil tests to possibly move <br />the alternate location of septic and shift the sport court away from the property line. <br />Sansevere asked how they failed to get a permit, when the contract with Sport Court stated <br />permits are the customer's responsibility. Mr. Gross stated that they have never had to <br />pull a permit for other projects. The contract was a 4 -page document and customer <br />responsibility was in no way flagged for them. It was his error, however, Sport Court <br />admitted they used to pull permits and this was the first year they did not pull permits. <br />Now because of mistakes like his, they are again pulling permits for customers. <br />Sansevere asked about the alternate site and sight lines. Mr. Gross stated there is a <br />sunroom off the house they can't see around, as well as a row of mature spruce trees. He <br />added they are concerned about people coming off the road to approach their four young <br />children. Sansevere asked if the yard will be fenced. He said it would be. He also said <br />the pool is kept covered, so they are not worried about that as a hazard. <br />Sansevere asked if they have a hardship. Mr. Gross stated they would have to remove a <br />number of mature trees. <br />Mr. Gross stated that he feels singled out when he sees the other sport courts around <br />Orono that are up against lot lines. <br />Barrett stated that the authority of the City to grant variances comes from the State statute, <br />which sets out determinations that can be seen in the resolution. Key is the City's <br />obligation to follow the law. Also, understand that if the law is read loosely in one case, it <br />is difficult to not read it loosely in another case. Council's task is to apply the law to the <br />application before them. They have had similar unfortunate cases in the past. <br />• Murphy stated he received two calls from John Bowman regarding the application. His <br />7 <br />