Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2003 <br />(6. Stubbs Bay Water Quality Improvements Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, <br />• Continued) <br />Thein stated there are not many aeration systems in operation, but the most successful one <br />is in the St. Paul Water Utility. Likely the cost would determine the best approach. <br />McMillan stated that water is a difficult medium to work with because it is constantly <br />moving. She felt they should pursue the next step and see what the residents were willing <br />to do. <br />Mayor Peterson asked what the time frame would be. Wyatt stated they want to hold the <br />stakeholder meeting in the next two months. <br />Sansevere asked when they would do the treatments. Key stated they treat in spring or <br />fall. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if they would want funding from the City for treatments. Wyatt <br />stated they are not seeking funding at this time, but need cooperation to meet with <br />residents and City staff. The cost of treatment would come out of the feasibility study and <br />depend on the project needs. Long Lake cost $75- 100,000. They have the ability to <br />assess the people who benefit from the project, however, Lake Minnetonka is viewed as a <br />regional resource, so they've used district funds for past projects on the lake. <br />is Sansevere asked what percentage of the cost for Long Lake's treatment was passed on to <br />the city. Wyatt stated they assumed the entire cost of the alum treatment. Thomas stated <br />that their projects are spread across the entire watershed district and they would expect <br />their work to be augmented by the City in terms of development and land filtration to <br />minimize runoff. They will determine what sort of project they can bring to Stubbs Bay, <br />and then identify what Orono can do to assist the desired outcome. <br />• <br />Sansevere stated that the residents would want to know what their cost will be. Thomas <br />stated that they develop a model to show the residents what the MCWD can do at their <br />own cost, and then discuss what the residents can do on their part. <br />White stated it sounded like a good educational opportunity, and suggested they stress <br />benefits other than water clarity. Thomas stated that they do not stress water clarity too <br />much because upper bays will never be clear due to years of wastewater treatment plant <br />discharge building up the internal load. What they try to do is improve the water quality <br />and prevent its further decline. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if there would be a large time commitment from City staff to get <br />the project up and running. Thomas stated that they would not need much staff time until <br />after the feasibility study is completed. Wyatt stated that at this time they needed to know <br />the City supported their plans to pursue the project and hold a stakeholder meeting to <br />11 of 16 <br />