My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
10-13-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 4:18:10 PM
Creation date
5/16/2012 4:18:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2003 <br />FIRE SERVICE REPORT <br />None. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*3. #03 -2936 Bruce Meese & Maureen Murphy, 3135 Casco Circle— Variance- <br />Resolution No. 5058 <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5058 granting a <br />hardcover variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78 -282 and 78- 1288(B) <br />to allow an existing lakeside deck to remain in the 0 -75' setback zone. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />• <br />4. #03 -2948 WJM Properties, LLC, 2605 West Wayzata Boulevard — Conditional <br />Use Permit Extension — Resolution No. 5059 <br />Gaffron stated the item was removed from Consent Agenda to clarify wording in the is <br />resolution. He stated that the applicants were asking for a 16 -month extension of the CUP <br />because they had issues to work through with the Watershed District. Until all matters <br />with the Watershed District are finalized, they cannot proceed with the required conditions <br />of Resolution No. 4845, which include a screening fence, berms, and trees at the north end <br />of the parking lot. The applicant expects resolution with the MCWD by the end of 2004. <br />Gaffron stated that the applicant's attorney. Peter Johnson, wanted to be sure that the <br />required temporary screening described in items 3 and 4 of Findings in the Resolution <br />only apply to the 15 parking stalls on the northeast end of the parking lot. <br />Murphy suggested that since the building would not progress for the next 16 months, the <br />City could ask the applicant to put a coat of paint on the face of the building. Mayor <br />Peterson, White, and Sansevere agreed that would be appropriate. Mayor Peterson stated <br />they should request the applicant paint the front of the building in good faith. <br />Mayor Peterson moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5059 <br />approving a 16 -month extension of the effective period of Resolutions No. 4585 and' <br />No. 4993 to December 31, 2004, due to delays as noted in the applicant's letter of <br />request which is part of the public record of Application #03 -2948 and hereby <br />approves an amendment to the Industrial Site Plan Approval granted via Resolution <br />• <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.