My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
06-09-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 10:17:10 AM
Creation date
5/16/2012 10:17:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JUNE 9, 2003 <br />10. #03 -2896 Bruce Boeder on behalf of Franciscus Bastiaens -665 Ferndale Road <br />North — Conditional use Permit and Variance — Continued <br />White asked about the driveway. Gaffron stated that code allows for one driveway access <br />per residence. North Ferndale Road is heavily trafficked and by policy they prefer the <br />applicants have one driveway, not two. <br />Boeder stated that they had planned to ask for 5 years, but Bastiaens decided to only <br />request 2 years, enough time for his son to finish college and get a start in life. He stated <br />that he had driven Ferndale and it is flat where the Bastiaens house is located and the <br />driveway access is easy to see. <br />Gaffron stated the code allows for one 20' curb cut per residence, but that the Public <br />Services Director could grant a second curb cut. Gappa stated that he recommended <br />against the second curb cut, but that the applicant could bring the request before Council. <br />Gaffron stated that the house was built in 1913, or potentially earlier. It was on a list of <br />significant buildings in Orono by the Historical Preservation Office, but was not on the <br />National Historical Register. Nothing currently preserves the building. He suggested the <br />applicant consider if the house was worth preserving, or possibly moving to another site. <br />• Gaffron stated that if the current septic became a problem, the applicant would have to <br />then tear up the yard at a greater expense to connect the house to the new septic. <br />Bastiaens stated that he would do so. <br />• <br />Sansevere asked if they were setting a precedent. Gaffron stated that it was precedent <br />setting to allow a guest house on a 2.3 acre lot in the 2 -acre zone, but that it was tempered <br />by the time limit of 2 years. With the agreement and escrow account, the City would have <br />the right and the money to remove the house at the end of the time frame. Barrett stated <br />that he saw no problem with the application. <br />Bastiaens asked how many acres he would need to keep the guest house. Gaffron stated <br />he would need a total of 4 acres to keep both houses on the same lot, and that it must meet <br />all lot standards, so that the houses could be split onto separate lots at some point. Boeder <br />stated that they could not configure the houses on the lot in such a manner to keep them <br />both. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that they were agreed on the guest house use, had resolved the <br />septic issue, were agreed on the time of 24 months, and the driveway issue would follow <br />the staff recommendation, knowing that the Bastiaens could appeal to keep the driveway <br />at the end of the 24 months. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.