My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
05-27-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 10:16:29 AM
Creation date
5/16/2012 10:16:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />-- -- Tuesday, May 27, 2003 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*10. #03 -2898 JULIE AND MIKE WHITTINGTON, 1981 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD — <br />VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 4984 <br />Sansevere moved, White seconded, to Adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4984, a Resolution approving the <br />construction of a deck above the existing concrete patio, not exceeding the existing 5,510 s.f. <br />(40.9 %) hardcover in the 75 -250' setback zone, and illustrating 86 s.f. of hardcover removals to the <br />west of the road for the residence located at 1981 Fagerness Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*11. #03 -2903, CITY OF ORONO — ZONING CODE AMENDMENT — PERSONAL WIRELESS <br />SERVICE TOWERS AND ANTENNAS — ORDINANCE NO. 226,2 nd SERIES <br />Sansevere moved, White seconded, to Adopt ORDINANCE NO. 226, 2 °d Series - an Ordinance <br />Amending Orono Zoning Code Sections 10.25, 10.27, and 10.28 Pertaining to Regulations for <br />Construction and Placement of Personal Wireless Service Antennas and Towers. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL REPORT <br />Sansevere suggested the Council discuss a resolution or ordinance which indicates that people cannot <br />carry a concealed weapon into the City Hall. He felt it was important to post some kind of signage to <br />protect staff and the public. <br />• Moorse indicated that it was not possible for a municipality to alter the legislation like that. <br />Barrett stated that the City could not `enforce' any sign that they posted. <br />Moorse noted that many of these same concerns are coming up elsewhere, and some cities are <br />encouraging their representatives through resolutions etc. to change the legislation. He believed it could <br />be altered during the legislature's special session. <br />While the lave would probably not be changed in the special session, Murphy maintained that much would <br />be altered over the next year. He stated that he would support the City adopting a resolution that says, as <br />a City Council, we are interested in protecting our citizens and City Hall, and that guns are not allowed. <br />He felt the City should stand up and say it does not support this action. <br />Sansevere suggested they post, as City policy, that guns are not allowed. <br />Barrett reiterated that, while the City could make this recommendation, it could not enforce this policy. <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 4990 stating that while the City <br />will work to see that the legislation is changed, the Council does not endorse carrying of firearms <br />into public buildings. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Nygard and Mayor Peterson opposed. <br />Murphy reported that he had attended, what he described as a disappointing meeting, with the head of the <br />MnDOT right -of -way organization last Friday. He voiced his concern that some of the citizens were not <br />being treated fairly by that organization and also that the values that have been applied to the properties <br />that Orono and Long Lake own, that MnDOT wants to acquire, were not being priced fairly by that <br />• <br />PAGE 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.