Laserfiche WebLink
_.,_ .n�.....a_.- .,is,.. .�u. •s ,c� .;S.s�.,cwar:e- . . :.,.7'�� .. .. . .. .. . . . .. . � . .... . <br /> . <br /> , z � . ' - :_ d'� :.. _:. _ _ .. ,a � . . , . <br /> � <br /> , , _ ..__. � ' - - <br /> - . . ; . . �. <br /> -�� - ei��v_._ . � .� .� . - . � . --- .. . . ,. , . . , .. , .. ._ . . . ._. _ _.. _ . . , . . <br /> ' . �� . .�� � . . . � }. . .. � � . . . . , <br /> ri�.�a�:�� ��' � <br /> -� � C�t� o� ORONO <br /> . •t3�a <br /> � 'Ya# <br /> Y4r� 'a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 4-� <br /> , .:..,. <br /> `. �: � . NO. 2667 , <br /> • - • • <br /> -,�: . <br /> y'p,"���"�9::���F � . <br /> d) Legally combined lots separated by a proposed new <br /> division line are subject to the regulations of this <br /> chapter if the resulting parcels do not meet the <br /> requirements of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code. <br /> The proposed subdivision falls under category "d" <br /> above, being a total of 4 lots legally combined for tax <br /> purposes with a proposal to separate the total of 4 <br /> parcels into 2 total parcels by a proposed new division <br /> line which does not follow any ot the existing lot <br /> lines. <br /> . 18. When 2 municipal sewer units were assessed to the <br /> property in 1970, that assessment anticipated the potential <br /> possibility that variances might be granted for construction <br /> of a second residence on the property. However, assessment <br /> of the second sewer unit did not, in and of itself, grant <br /> the property owner a future right to build a second <br /> • residence on the property. <br /> 19. Denial of the requested variances, and therefore denial <br /> of the subdivision application, does not constitute a taking <br /> of property or loss of substantial value because the <br /> property has always been one residential building site, all <br /> of which has served as lot area, yard and open space fvr the <br /> residence which continues to occupy said property. The <br /> applicant of his own free will combined the four pre- <br /> existing tax parcels into one tax parcel defining the <br /> property as one property containing one residence in 1976, <br /> and has enjoyed its benefits as a fully conforming <br /> residential lot within the LR-1S zoning district since that <br /> time, and can continue to enjoy the same benefits and value <br /> without the requested subdivision. <br /> NOW, TH$R$FORE, B8 IT R$SOI,VI3D, that the City Counci 1 <br /> of the City of Orono hereby denies Revin and Earl Norwood's <br /> requested subdivision of the property and further denies any and <br /> all variances from Zoning Code performance standards, which <br /> variances would have been required in order to approve the said <br /> subdivision, based upon one or more of the findings of fact <br /> concerning this property noted above. � <br /> • . Page 7 of 8 <br />