My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2635
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2600 - 2699 (March 13, 1989 - September 11, 1989)
>
Resolution 2635
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 1:59:38 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 1:59:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ci.t� of ORONO <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2635 <br /> • - • • <br /> B) The need for adequate security for the applicants' <br /> young children is obvious given the speed and volume of <br /> traffic on County Road 19 directly adjacent to the <br /> street yard which functions as applicants' rear yard. <br /> C) The proposed 6' high f ence a 1 ong County Road 19 i s <br /> reasonable given the applicants' dual purpose to reduce <br /> traffic noise while providing a barrier that may not be <br /> scaled by young children. Likewise, the 4' high fence <br /> at the interior of the lot is appropriate to provide <br /> adequate security given the proximity to roadways. <br /> D) The 6' high fences take on the character of <br /> accessory structures on a through lot and require that <br /> a conditional use permit be granted. <br /> 4. On 5-8-89 the applicants requested that the interior <br /> • fences be allowed at a 5' height for visual and safety <br /> purposes. The Council finds that such a fence height is <br /> appropriate for those areas. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application <br /> including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> Commission, reports by City staff , comments by the <br /> applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> hea 1 th, saf ety and we 1 f are of the community. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br /> to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a <br /> � convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to <br /> � alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> • Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.