My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-28-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04-28-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 9:59:20 AM
Creation date
5/16/2012 9:59:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 28, 2003 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />LMCD REPORT, Continued <br />positive $15,000 balance for Working Capital Appeal Fund. She explained that the LMCD is in <br />negotiations with the MCWD over the watershed taking over the milfoil harvesting program in an effort <br />to remove additional phosphorous from the lake. Since Orono budgets $13,700 for removal of exotics, <br />she indicated that this would mean a cost savings for the community if MCWD takes over the program. <br />Sansevere asked if the MCWD would have the budget to add this to their responsibilities. <br />McMillan stated that the LMCD would likely still handle the harvesting, but the MCWD would step up <br />the removals. She reported that MCWD would be running tests over the summer and include this in its <br />2004 budget. Currently, MCWD views this as a potentially inexpensive method of removing <br />phosphorous from the lakes, and due to the broad community base it supports McMillan felt this to be a <br />good match for the project. <br />White asked for the status of the zebra mussel program and whether additional funds would be available <br />to expand the checkpoints. <br />McMillan explained that the LMCD, along with the LMA (Lake Minnetonka Association), intends to add <br />to the DNR inspection process on a small scale by helping to fund additional inspectors and continuing <br />education programs. <br />• <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS • <br />Ron Miller, 260 Willow Drive North, stood up and asked several questions of the City Council. First, he <br />asked the City Council if they felt it was fair for him to expect to have his professional documents <br />supplied to the City filled out accurately, and if he should expect contractors /subcontractors to perform <br />quality work. This being said, he indicated that he had several issues with the City. <br />Mr. Miller stated that, after questioning William Walters of the Long Lake Fire Station, he sent a letter to <br />the City regarding the use of potentially contaminated rock on the site. He indicated that he'd asked the <br />engineering firm where and who had provided the rock to the City for the sewer and water project and <br />was given no information. Mr. Miller voiced his concern that the rock might not have been accurately <br />tested prior to use. <br />A second issue revolved around the ditch between his property and the City's lot. He explained that the <br />City installed a culvert in the ditch that has continually been plugged up thus causing his property to <br />flood. After asking the City to clean it up, and deciding to do so himself, he found a mess clogging the <br />culvert and shared several pictures. He also believed that the wetland mitigation effort was designed <br />improperly, since the water is not bypassing his property as planned. <br />Finally, Mr. Miller explained that he wished to be given a definition of a residential lot line as it refers to <br />the necessity for screening the property near the Long Lake Fire Station. He indicated that he had spoken <br />to Mr. Gaffron, who stated that the residential lot line refers to residential property that adjoins the Fire <br />Station property and parking. <br />PAGE 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.