My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2003 Council Minutes Local Board of Appeal & Equalization
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
04-23-2003 Council Minutes Local Board of Appeal & Equalization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 9:58:14 AM
Creation date
5/16/2012 9:58:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MEETING <br />Wednesday, April 23, 2003 <br />• 7:00 o',clock p.m. <br />Woodhouse argued that the City had failed to apply enough value to the architectural significance <br />of the house on the middle parcel. He stated that the home was in superb condition and a Philip <br />Johnson original. On the other hand, there are few lots that would be assigned as much value as his <br />vacant parcel has next door. <br />Although assessed at $1,450,000, Murphy questioned what value Mr. Woodhouse felt should be <br />assigned to the parcel containing the Gehry home. <br />Although a bit larger than the vacant parcel, and lakeshore across the busy road, Woodhouse felt <br />that the value would more accurately support $900,000. He pointed out that the 2 acre neighboring <br />parcels sold at $250,000 each (without lakeshore). He agreed that there were no easy answers how <br />to apply values to these properties. <br />White asked if the comparable properties in the neighborhood sold for a mere $250,000. <br />Sansevere agreed that the sticker shock was enormous. He wondered how the properties could <br />have more than doubled over the past year. <br />Jensen noted that the lakeshore values have grown 14% in 2002 and 17% in 2003, not to mention <br />the impact the middle parcel has made on the value. She asked who was qualified to put a value on <br />architectural significance, and suggested the applicant determine this using his own resources. <br />. Woodhouse stated that assigning a $350 per s.f. value was significant. <br />Sansevere noted that the Johnson home was appraised at $437,000, while the land was appraised at <br />$1,500,000, for a total of $1,937,000. <br />Woodhouse argued that those values should be reversed. Woodhouse asked what other properties <br />in Orono, off the lake, are valued at $1.5 million for 4 acres. <br />Sansevere asked what the values were on either side of the parcel. <br />Jensen pointed out that the Irwin Jacobs parcel next door does not help the comparison, whereas, <br />the properties to the west are smaller sites.off Heritage Drive that have sold between $400,000- <br />$800,000. <br />Murphy felt there was an awful lot of subjectivity to this appraisal, he wondered if a 35% valuation <br />was warranted over the past year and a half. <br />White argued that valuations don't typically push a property value up over 100% as in this case. <br />Jensen stated that the values had been too low in the past and they were just catching up after the <br />rearrangement last year. <br />As this was deemed an incredible jump, Sansevere asked if there was any leeway they could give <br />to Woodhouse regarding the appraisal. He questioned whether the City could find someone who <br />• could more accurately determine the value of the Johnson home versus land value. <br />PAGE 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.