My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
03-10-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 9:55:10 AM
Creation date
5/16/2012 9:55:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2003 <br />• 5. #02 -2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street — Variances— Continued <br />Murphy stated it seemed the applicant would either need more land or a smaller house. <br />Allers stated that if a 200' wide, 2 -acre lot required 30' setbacks, then it made sense for <br />100' wide, 1.3 -acre lot to need 15' setbacks because proportionately it was the same. He <br />asked why Council felt the code applied to his situation and the neighborhood. Nygard <br />stated that they didn't necessarily, but the code was what they had to work with. He <br />suggested Allers and the neighbors get a petition going to change the code and rezone the <br />neighborhood, giving the Council something new to consider. <br />Mayor Peterson suggested they table the application. <br />Barrett stated that he agreed with staff. The Council had to work within the laws and <br />identify a hardship. The inability to get a certain width house was not a hardship. If <br />Council granted a variance, it would set a precedent. <br />Allers asked what they would have to do to rezone. Gaffron stated they would need to <br />look at the adjacent zones to determine what district the neighborhood should be rezoned. <br />Sansevere asked if it was worth pursuing. Gaffron stated that if they could rezone to 1- <br />acre and not create higher density, and meet the City's goals with the rezoning, then it <br />• might be worth considering. <br />• <br />Murphy asked what precedent the rezoning would set. Moorse stated they would have to <br />consider the entire City and rezone all similar neighborhoods. Murphy stated they should <br />not rezone to fit the homes, but the homes should fit the zoning. Sansevere stated it would <br />set too great a precedent. <br />Nygard stated that when the neighborhood was zoned, they didn't expect it to be sewered. <br />Allers asked why they couldn't consider each neighborhood on its own merits as issues <br />came up. <br />Sansevere asked if they would take in the house 1' on the south side and 3' on the north to <br />fit the Planning Commission's recommendations. Allers stated he would look into it. <br />Sansevere asked if they could work with the existing foundation in order to avoid needing <br />any variances at all. It would be the simplest solution. Allers stated they would work <br />with staff to find a solution. <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to table #02 -2829, Blake & Mary <br />Bichanich, 322 Westlake Street. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.