Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2003 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #02 -2753 WESLEY BYRNE, Continued) <br />comments in support of the applicant and the Planning Commission reached the following <br />conclusions: <br />1. Both the applicant and City bear some responsibility for the misunderstanding of what <br />additions were intended and what roof expansions were actually being proposed. <br />2. In 2002, the Planning Commission felt they were primarily approving additions to the <br />existing residence, and the existing residence would not change substantially. The Planning <br />Commission felt the extent of the removals now far exceeds what they expected. <br />3. The applicant's structural engineer has identified verbally that the foundation below the <br />remaining first floor requires renovation to continue to serve the first and second floors. <br />4. The Planning Commission recommended that within the 10' side yard, the applicant <br />should be allowed only to retain or replace structure within the envelope of the original <br />house walls and roof. Therefore, the building plans would have to be revised to match, not <br />exceed, the original spaces that pre- existed, and the second story roof may not be raised <br />beyond what previously existed. <br />While functionally granting a variance to allow construction within the side yard, the vote • <br />on the above conclusion was 6 -1, with Alternate Hannaford in the minority opinion that <br />due to the circumstances the applicant should be allowed to construct the expanded 2nd <br />story as shown in the plans. <br />Mr. Byrne stated that throughout the planning stages of the project he had worked closely <br />with planning staff to design a proposal that, he believed, covered all his bases. He <br />acknowledged that he probably should have provided better drawings originally, however, <br />maintained that the drawings had not changed from what the City had seen from the start. <br />While he had anticipated some problems with a 60 year old foundation, he wasn't aware of <br />the extent of the demolition that would be needed versus repair. After several uneventful <br />visits by Inspector Lyle Oman, he was unaware that 7 months into construction, the project <br />would be halted. Mr. Byrne asked the Council to allow him to build the home he had <br />originally planned and submitted, adding that to change things now that the trusses were <br />built and windows bought would be very costly to him. <br />Mayor Peterson asked how far along the construction was when Lyle Oman had visited. <br />Mr. Byrne pointed out that the inspector had been out on occasion. He believed the last <br />visit had been when the footings of walls and the basement had been inspected. As of late <br />Inspector Bruce Vang, along with his own structural engineer identified the necessity to <br />correct the silt plate and rot along the foundation. • <br />PAGE 4 of 28 <br />