Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,January 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3171 JOHN AND JOAN BROOKS, CONTINUED) <br /> Municipal Code Section 18-2 regarding obstructions within the right-of-way and to the provisions of <br /> Minnesota Statutes regarding reconstruction of nonconformities. <br /> The applicants are proposing to cosmetically upgrade the existing old garage/shed structure at the base of <br /> the slope west of the house to make it more useful recreationally. The shed has existed for many decades <br /> and is considered as legally nonconforming and is set back 50 feet from the shoreline. The proposed <br /> upgrades are primarily non-structural and do not increase the height of bulk of structure and require no <br /> special approvals. However, the applicants also propose to add a toilet, lavatory and sink to the building. <br /> Installation of the toilet requires a conditional use permit. <br /> Staff has no specific issues with the toilet installation; although it should be noted that the building does <br /> not meet condition 17(d)in that it is not conforming in location. However, it is a legally nonconforming <br /> building and cannot be relocated to serve its intended purpose and still be conforming within the lower <br /> west yard, since all locations in that yard are less than 75 feet from some portion of the shoreline. <br /> Conditional use permit approval should be subject to the standard conditions for approval as noted above. <br /> In addition,the applicant is proposing to remove an old detached 16' by 16' deck near the lakeshore south <br /> of the accessory building and replace it nearer the building and further from the shoreline. The existing <br /> deck is 11 feet from the shoreline and the proposed replacement deck will be 33 feet from the shore. The <br /> old deck appears on old air photos, as does a stairway leading up to the main house,which sits on a <br /> plateau 20-25' above the lake. The reconstructed stairway is also proposed to include appropriate <br /> landings, and it will be relocated further from the shore but still within the 0-75' setback zone. The <br /> stairway as proposed is an allowed encroachment within the 0-75' zone and is required to provide <br /> reasonable access to the lower level and lakeshore. <br /> Gaffron stated overall the hardcover on the site would be reduced by 64 square feet in the 0-75' zone, a <br /> reduction from 10.22 percent to 10.16 percent. The only prior zoning activity on this property involved <br /> reconstruction of the main house in 1984, for which lake setback and hardcover variances were granted, <br /> and a guest apartment conditional use permit at that time for replacement of a prior such apartment above <br /> the attached garage. Gaffron noted that variance application was completed at a time when the City did <br /> not require applicants to provide detailed hardcover calculations, and the 0-75' hardcover was estimated <br /> by Staff at 7 to 8 percent and 27 percent in the 75'-250' zone. <br /> Staff finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be detrimental to the <br /> residential character of the neighborhood due to its size and remote location from any other properties. <br /> Staff further finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed include a toilet, lavatory and sink, which is in <br /> keeping with the intent of the ordinance. The accessory building is conforming in size and height,but is <br /> legally nonconforming in location. However, it is a pre-existing building that is not being structurally <br /> altered. In addition, the property owner must agree to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property <br /> providing that the accessory building will not be, one,used for a home occupation unless specifically <br /> approved by the city or if allowed by city code; two,used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional <br /> use permit is obtained; three,rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any <br /> circumstances. The applicant should understand the covenant and agree to execute the covenant as part of <br /> this approval. <br /> PAGE 26 <br />